Draw Media
News / Kurdistan

British minister of state meets with a group of Kurdish journalists

The British Secretary of State for Middle East Affairs met with a group of journalists and NGO’S in Erbil to discuss freedom of expression and women's issues. Lord Tariq Ahmed, British Minister of State for Middle East, Africa, South Asia and the United Nations affairs at the British Foreign Office with Mark Bryson Richardson, British Ambassador to Iraq and Rosie Cave, British Consul General in the Kurdistan Region met with representatives of the media (Metro, Darw, Paragraf) and representatives of women journalists, listened to the journalists on the situation of freedom of expression and violations against journalists and women.

Read more

The Kurdistan Regional Government owes $3.348 billion to oil companies

Draw Media In (2022) the Kurdistan Regional Government has paid back $ 1 billion and 115 million to the oil companies, which due to falling oil prices and the coronavirus could not be paid on time. The Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) has repaid $331.104 million in loans to the companies in the first three months of last year, including $206.4 million to oil producing companies and $125 million to Turkish Companies. In the second quarter of last year, $422.465 million was repaid to oil companies in the Kurdistan Region, while in the third quarter, $194.220 million was repaid. In the last three months of last year, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) has repaid $167 million and 478 thousand debts to oil companies. In addition to repaying the debts of both Turkish energy company and Turkish Petroleum Company The Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) repaid $990.267 million to the other oil companies last year. Last year, an average of 9 percent of the oil sales were paid back to previous debts of the companies, which currently (KRG) owes $3.348 billion to oil companies.

Read more

The oil values in Iraq and the Kurdistan Region in 2022

Draw Media Based on Deloitte reports, compared to the data of the Iraqi Ministry of Oil and the measures of SOMO, the value of oil in (Iraq and the Kurdistan Region) and the (KRG oil through SOMO) in 2022 is as follows; 🔹 The average cost of a barrel of oil in the Kurdistan Region was more than (45.93) dollars and in Iraq (13.38) dollars, in other words (54%) of the revenue of every barrel of oil went to the cost of the process and in Iraq only (14%) was the cost of the process. 🔹 If the Kurdistan Region had sold oil at the price and cost of SOMO, then instead of (39.06) dollars per barrel, (82.16) dollars would remain, that is, instead of returning 5 billion and 709 million dollars to the government treasury, (11 billion) dollars would return to the government treasury.   First, compare the oil prices of the Kurdistan Region and Iraq in According to the analysis, the Iraqi government in 2022, through the Iraqi Oil Marketing Company (SOMO) sold an average of $ 95.54 per barrel, the total value of oil sold was (115 billion 466 million 245 thousand) dollars. According to Duraid Abdullah, researcher and expert; “Foreign Oil Companies have 20% share out of 70% of the exported Iraq’s oil. "Iraq spent $16.1 billion last year on oil production," he said. According to this analysis, the return rate of Iraqi oil revenue was 86% and 14% went to the cost of oil processing. In other words, an average of $82.16 per barrel of oil sold returned to the Iraqi treasury and $13.38 was spent per barrel. But that is not true for the Kurdistan Region! According to Deloitte, the Kurdistan Regional Government in 2022, through the Kurdistan oil pipeline, sold an average of $ 84.99 per barrel and the total value of oil sold and delivered to foreign buyers (through the pipeline except domestic) was (12 billion 331 million 417 thousand 848) dollars and (90 million 843 thousand 46) dollars from domestic oil sales, but only (5 billion 709 million 704 thousand 87) dollars were put on revenue and the KRG General Treasury (Ministries of Finance and Natural Resources). Accordingly, the return rate of oil revenue was 46% and 54% went to the expenditure of the oil process. In other words, only $39.06 per barrel of oil sold in the Kurdistan region returned to the general treasury and $45.93 was spent per barrel of oil for the production process.

Read more

Draw Media publishes the KRG proposal and the response of the Iraqi Ministry of Oil regarding the oil and gas law

Draw Media According to a document obtained by (Draw Media), the Legal Office of the Iraqi Oil Ministry on 15/2/2023 have responded to the proposals of the Kurdistan Region regarding the oil and gas law and rejects 10 out of 15 suggestions. The proposals have not been directed to the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) delegation, but instead the legal office has submitted to the Iraqi Oil Ministry. The Iraqi Oil Ministry is against the KRG (selling oil, having its own oil and gas pipelines, having an oil and gas council, and reviving the KRG's oil and gas law after being repealed by the Federal Court). These are the details of the recent discussions between the Kurdistan Regional Government delegation and the central government on how to write the draft of the oil and gas law. The Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) has presented its proposal on the law in 15 points. The central government has rejected 10 points of the KRG's proposals, which is 67% of the proposals.   • Article 111 of the Constitution One of the principles that the Kurdistan Regional Government delegation in the negotiations to prepare the draft law on oil and gas submitted to the Iraqi Ministry of Oil, compliance with Article (111) of the Iraqi Constitution. Article 111 of the constitution states that "oil and gas in all regions and provinces belong to the entire Iraqi people." The Iraqi government agrees with the KRG, because it believes that this article of the constitution defines a good basis for the ownership of oil and gas and does not give any rights to either the central government or the KRG. Grant of permission The KRG has proposed that the issuance of oil licenses should be under the authority of the parties specified in the constitution, while the contracts for the fields  in the Kurdistan region should be under the authority of the region, in accordance with Article 115 of the constitution. The federal government rejects the proposal, saying that the constitution does not give the authority to grant oil exploration and extraction licenses to any party, but in Article 112 writes that the federal government together with the Kurdistan Regional Government will manage the oil and gas extracted from existing fields. Transfer of ownership! The KRG has proposed that the oil and gas law allow for the “transfer of ownership of oil and gas to others at the point of delivery”. The central government disagrees with the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) on this proposal, saying that such a provision cannot be included in the oil and gas law, because it is contrary to Article 111 of the constitution. The Iraqi government proposes to leave the regulation of the transfer of oil and gas ownership to the sales contracts signed for this purpose.  Oil and gas policy The KRG has proposed that the Federal Council and the Regional Council for Oil and Gas Affairs take over the preparation of the strategic oil and gas policy. The central government opposes the KRG's proposal, saying it is unconstitutional and could open the door to the creation of councils in oil-producing provinces. Oil and gas policy The KRG has proposed that the Federal Council and the Regional Council for Oil and Gas Affairs take over the preparation of the strategic oil and gas policy. The central government is against the KRG's proposal, saying that “This proposal is unconstitutional and could open the door to the creation of councils in oil-producing provinces,". In addition, it will lead to a plurality of stakeholders responsible for setting the overall oil and gas strategy. Who should sell oil? The KRG has proposed that the region have its own marketing company and deposit crude oil revenues into an international account under the control of the region and the revenues from the sale of oil from the federal government into another account. The central government has rejected the proposal, saying it is contrary to the law regulating the Ministry of Oil and the rules of the oil marketing company. "The proposal also contradicts the provisions of the Financial Administration Law and the Federal Budget Law, which state that all revenues from the sale of crude oil must be deposited in an account opened for this purpose.

Read more

Shock survey reflects frustration with ruling parties among Iraqi Kurds

Amwaj Media The story: Rising economic and political dissatisfaction in Iraqi Kurdistan is bolstering an apparent belief that devolved rule under the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) only benefits the ruling elite, rather than the broader population. While this dynamic may not pose an immediate threat to the political dominance of either party, it could undermine the legitimacy and effectiveness of their rule. It is also dangerous for the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) in the context of its ongoing disputes with the federal government over the budget, oil, and the disputed areas. The coverage: A new opinion poll conducted by Erbil-based research firm Sheekar Research shows that just over half of respondents believe they’d be better off if the KRG was dissolved and central authority from Baghdad reasserted. •             On its face, the seemingly prevalent sentiment is surprising given the decades-long struggle for Kurdish autonomy in Iraq and the horrors under the previous Baathist regime. It would also be a profound shift from just six years ago, when 92.73% of participants in the Kurdistan region’s 2017 independence referendum cast ballots in favor of seceding from Iraq. •             The survey polled 1,000 people between Jan. 27-28 from across Iraqi Kurdistan using a weighted sample to reflect local demographics. It was conducted using online survey app Prsyar, which randomly selects respondents from a database of 80,000 pre-registered, Kurdish-speaking users to fit a desired sample profile. Respondents were also asked about how they view recent decisions by the federal supreme court against the KRG. Last February, the court ruled that Iraqi Kurdistan’s oil and gas law was unconstitutional, throwing its contracts with international oil companies into legal jeopardy. More recently, the top court on Jan. 25 found that budget transfers arranged between former Iraqi premier Mustafa Al-Kadhimi (2020-22) and KRG Prime Minister Masrour Barzani were illegal. •             A plurality of survey respondents (46%) saw the court’s decisions as “illegal” and “issued against” Iraqi Kurdistan. Yet, most respondents either supported (10%) or felt neutral (42%) about the rulings because they felt the court was primarily punishing the KDP and the PUK. •             The survey also asked about who is to blame for the KRG’s apparent weakness in Baghdad. A fifth of respondents (21%) said the KDP and the PUK were responsible, while a further 47% blamed all Kurdish parties—including the ruling duopoly and opposition groups. One-third of respondents were unsure. The survey results were published by independent outlet Draw Media and then picked up by social media accounts, sparking fierce discussion online. •             Kurdish nationalists denounced the opinion poll with one KRG official pointing to the result of the 2017 independence referendum as a counterpoint. The context/analysis: While the sentiments against devolved rule have shocked many observers, they mainly appear to reflect intense popular frustration with the governance of the KDP and the PUK. Such attitudes should therefore be read as a clear call for improved devolved governance, rather than pro-Baghdad sentiment. •             The KDP and the PUK have governed Iraqi Kurdistan since 1992. Though the semi-autonomous zone is generally more developed than much of the rest of Iraq, wealth is concentrated in the hands of a small elite connected with the ruling parties. •             Since 2014, Iraqi Kurdistan has faced significant economic upheaval caused by periods of low oil prices, the war against the Islamic State group (IS), and budget disputes with Baghdad. Austerity measures have involved cuts to public sector salaries, which the KRG occasionally fails to pay on time. Corruption and lack of investment have furthermore inhibited the development of the private sector. •             According to Sheekar Research, its respondents include a high proportion of government workers, reflecting the public sector’s outsized importance in the economy. Concerns about whether the KRG can pay salaries and a view that Baghdad is more reliable in this regard have likely been reflected in the poll results. Public frustration with the Kurdish ruling parties runs deep, driven by growing economic inequality, poor access to public services, and lack of opportunities to register dissent. •             The KDP and the PUK are increasingly restricting freedom of expression and cracking down on the ability of residents to organize protests. •             Planned elections for the regional parliament last year were scrapped after the KDP and the PUK were unable to agree on a new electoral law. It is unclear whether they will be able to pass legislation in time for the delayed polls to be held in the autumn. •             Iraqi Kurds continue to migrate to Europe at high levels, despite the dangers inherent in that journey. Of further note, public opinion surveys are rare in Iraqi Kurdistan. Narratives about events are often shaped by elite actors to suit their own purposes and spread by partisan media outlets. As a result, seemingly unvarnished public opinion data can come as a surprise to observers, making it all the more valuable. The future: Within Iraqi Kurdistan, the political dominance of the KDP and the PUK remains unchallenged, but public opinion appears to become hard set against the duopoly. This trajectory will likely become intensified by continued economic difficulties. •             The seemingly fading support for the status quo could prove fertile ground for new political opposition factions or social movements, including Islamist groups. •             Rising public discontent could also hamper the ruling Kurdish parties’ ability to rally support for the KRG amid a drive by some players in Baghdad to centralize power through court decisions. Continued squabbling between the KDP and the PUK amid underwhelming governance could additionally impact support for Iraqi Kurdistan by foreign partners, which has been important to its development and economic well-being.  

Read more

Iraqi Kurdistan Suspends Oil Exports Through Turkey After earthquake

The KRG said it was suspending oil exports through Turkey as a precaution after a deadly earthquake rocked its northern neighbor and Syria before dawn on Monday. "Due to the earthquake that hit Turkey and Syria, and to ensure the safety of oil exports and prevent any undesirable incidents, oil exports through the pipeline connecting the Kurdistan region to Turkey have been suspended," the Kurdish ministry of natural resources said in a statement. The Kurdistan regional government usually exports around 450,000 barrels of oil a day through Turkey. It has continued to pump oil out of the country despite the federal authorities demanding a halt to the trade. "The Kurdistan Regional Government confirms the halt of oil exportation through Turkey's Ceyhan due to the earthquake that struck several areas in the country," tweeted Lawk Ghafuri, head of foreign media relations in Kurdistan. "The exportation will resume after careful inspection of the pipelines finalised." A 7.8-magnitude earthquake hit southern Turkey and neighbouring Syria on Monday, killing more than 1,000 people and causing widespread damage, with tremors felt as far away as Egypt and Iraq.  

Read more

KRG oil revenues in December

The Kurdistan Region exported 11 million 825 thousand barrels of oil in December, selling at an average price of $70 per barrel, earning $832 million 953 thousand. Of which $466 million for expenditure and $366 million remained for the government treasury. notice; The exchange rate of the US dollar against the Iraqi Dinar was 1,450 Dinars, according to the Central Bank of Iraq. Non-oil revenues • Non-oil revenues for December = (287 billion) dinars (according to the latest statements of the Minister of Finance) • Coalition assistance to the Peshmerga forces = (31 billion 500 million) dinars • Kurdistan Region's share of the Iraqi budget = (0) dinars Oil revenues (pipeline exports) • In December 2022, the Kurdistan Region exported 11 million 825 thousand barrels of oil. • The average price of Brent oil for December was $82.44 • Because the Kurdistan Region sells its oil at $12 less, it has sold an average of $70.44 (although the value of the Kurdistan Region's oil is said to be about $20 less, but not officially or by Deloitte). So: (11 million 825 thousand) barrels X ($70.44) = (832 million 953 thousand) dollars. That is, in dinars, it is: (832 million 953 thousand) dollars X (1450) dinars = (1 trillion 207 billion 781 million 850 thousand) dinars. • According to the latest Deloitte report, 56% of oil revenues are spent and 44% remains for the Ministry of Natural Resources. - So: (832 million 953 thousand) dollars X (56%) = (466 million 453 thousand 680) dollars goes to the cost of oil processing. - (832 million 953 thousand) dollars X (44%) = (366 million 499 thousand 320) dollars remaining. Oil revenue in dinars is: (366 million 499 thousand 320) dollars X (1450) dinars = (531 billion 424 million 14 thousand) dinars. Total Revenue in December 2022 (Dinar) (531 billion 424 million 14 thousand) oil revenue + (287 billion) domestic revenue + (31 billion 500 million) allies = (849 billion 924 million 14 thousand) dinars

Read more

The Kurdistan Region makes $38 and Iraq makes $82 in a barrel of oil

Oil values in Iraq and the Kurdistan Region in 2022 🔹 The average cost of a barrel of oil in the Kurdistan Region was more than (49) dollars and in Iraq (13.38) dollars, in other words (56%) of the oil revenue in Kurdistan went to the cost of the production process. 🔹 If the Kurdistan Region had sold oil at the price and cost of SOMO, then instead of $38.6, would have $82.16 left. Which means the KRG’s total net revenue would be $11 billion instead of $5 billion. Comparison of oil values in Kurdistan Region and Iraq in (2022) According to the analyses, the Iraqi government in 2022, through the Iraqi Oil Marketing Company (SOMO) sold oil for $95.54 per barrel on average. the total value of oil sold was (115 billion 466 million 245 thousand) dollars. According to Duraid Abdullah, researcher and expert; “Foreign oil companies have 20% share out of 70% of Iraq's oil exports." According to this information last year, Iraq have spent $16.1 billion for the oil production process. In other words, an average of $82.16 per barrel of oil sold returned to the Iraqi treasury and $13.38 was spent per barrel. But this is not true for the Kurdistan Region! Because according to analyses, the Kurdistan Regional Government in 2022, through the Kurdistan oil pipeline, on average sold oil for $87.58 per barrel. The value of oil sold was (12 billion 784 million 353 thousand 956) dollars, but the amount of (5 billion 625 million 115 thousand 741) dollars returned to the general treasury of the Kurdistan Regional Government. Accordingly, the return rate of oil revenue was 44% and 56% went to the expenditure of the oil process. In other words, only $38.65 per barrel of oil sold in the region returned to the general treasury and $49.2 per barrel was spent.

Read more

Trafigura Ends Oil Deal with Kurdistan After Snub at Davos

•             Trader was owed about $273 million under prepayment contract •             Firm tried to renegotiate deal but Kurdish PM canceled meeting By Jack Farchy Commodities trading giant Trafigura Group is ending a relationship with the government of Kurdistan in northern Iraq, a fresh blow to the region’s ability to sell its oil independently. The parting of ways comes after Trafigura failed to renegotiate the terms of its contract with the Kurdistan Regional Government following a drop in the price of Kurdish oil, according to a person familiar with the matter. After the Kurdistan government refused to renegotiate, Trafigura pinned its hopes on talks with Prime Minister Masrour Barzani in Davos, but a planned meeting last week was canceled by the Kurdish leader at the last minute without explanation, the person said, asking not to be named as the matter wasn’t public. Trafigura was one of several trading houses that, starting in 2014-15, lent billions of dollars to the cash-strapped government of Kurdistan in exchange for future oil sales, in the process helping to finance its bid for independence. Oil is the lifeblood of Kurdistan’s economy, accounting for more than half the government’s revenues, and the exports through Turkey have underpinned its autonomy from Baghdad. For the traders, the deals with cash-strapped Kurdistan represented a potentially lucrative opportunity to secure new flows of oil. But selling Kurdish oil has become more difficult in the past year as Baghdad — which disputes the autonomous region’s right to sell its oil independently — has stepped up legal threats against buyers at the same time as a flood of discounted Russian oil has weighed on prices. “After working together successfully over a number of years, the KRG and Trafigura are amicably parting ways, bringing to an end their long-term contractual arrangements,” the two sides said in a joint statement emailed by a Trafigura spokesperson. After the Davos snub, Trafigura had been preparing to send an acceleration notice to the Kurdistan government, demanding immediate repayment of the money it was owed, the person said. As of last week, the trading house was owed some $273 million in prepayments it had made for future oil flows. Baghdad has long protested Kurdistan’s oil sales, but it has stepped up a campaign against them in the past year in the wake of an Iraqi court ruling in February that found the federal oil ministry should have oversight of Kurdish production. In August, Iraq’s state-run oil marketing company SOMO sent a letter to traders warning them of legal action if they bought Kurdish oil without Baghdad’s approval. Kurdistan’s oil exports of about 400,000 barrels a day are a small fraction of Baghdad’s sales of more than 3 million barrels. There’s evidence that Baghdad’s threats had an impact. Tanker tracking data monitored by Bloomberg show that shipments of Kurdish crude to ports in Spain, Greece and Italy dropped sharply from the middle of 2022, with flows increasing to Israel, Croatia and China in the second half of the year and into the start of 2023. The Kurdistan government owed a total of $3.5 billion to oil buyers at the end of June last year, according to its latest audited oil accounts. Meanwhile, $620 million of oil revenues were stuck in bank accounts in Lebanon as a result of the country’s financial crisis, according to the accounts. The importance of the Lebanese accounts for Kurdistan’s oil wealth became public thanks to a legal battle between a company controlled by veteran trader Murtaza Lakhani and Lebanon’s BankMed SAL. Read more: Billion Dollar Broker: How One Man Managed a Nation’s Oil Wealth The Kurdistan government has itself been seeking to renegotiate the prices it pays to oil producers in the region. ShaMaran Petroleum Corp. announced in October that its Kurdish unit had agreed to change the benchmark against which its crude was priced from Dated Brent to Kurdistan Blend, known as KBT. Separately, another producer said the change amounted to a $10-a-barrel reduction in prices for September. Still, not all oil producers in Kurdistan have agreed to a change. DNO ASA’s managing director said in November that it was “not at this time engaged in active discussions” with the Kurdistan government about a change to the pricing formula. Genel Energy Plc’s chief financial officer told investors last week it “had not accepted any change in pricing mechanism.” In Davos last week, Barzani was focused on shoring up political support for Erbil as well as attracting new investment. He met with the prime ministers of the Netherlands and Belgium, as well as former British prime minister Tony Blair, among others, according to the Kurdistan government’s website.  

Read more

Uncertainty hangs over Iraqi Kurdistan in 2023

BY HAMZEH HADAD In his recent visit to Iraq, the White House coordinator for the Middle East and North Africa, Brett McGurk, focused much of his attention on Iraqi Kurdistan. This region has been a relatively stable part of Iraq, post-2003, but now faces a heightened risk of internal fragmentation and external threat. Frequent foreign attacks undermine prospects for stabilizing Iraq two decades after the U.S. invasion. The formation of a consensus Iraqi government in October, which includes both major Kurdish parties, presents an opportunity to resolve internal Kurdish issues, as well as outstanding ones with Baghdad, but this can be done only with American support. Ensuring stability in Iraqi Kurdistan is important for the U.S. and its allies. The region plays host to coalition troops and various international organizations serving Iraq and Syria. Moreover, previous instances of instability in Iraqi Kurdistan, such as the financial crisis in 2020, triggered major refugee flows into Europe. For many years, NATO member Turkey has had military bases in Iraq to fight the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), which both Ankara and Washington view as a terrorist group. Turkish airstrikes and skirmishes have killed many Turkish and PKK fighters, as well as Iraqi civilians. In late July, public anger with Turkey peaked when a Turkish airstrike hit a park in Duhok governorate, killing at least eight civilians and wounding more than 20, many of whom were tourists from central and southern Iraq. These operations also have displaced many families, most notably indigenous minorities such as Yazidis and Assyrians. Turkey claims to have official approval to operate, but Iraq’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has denounced these attacks. It is believed that the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) has allowed these operations to take place in defiance of Baghdad. Turkish airstrikes have continued in 2023 — the latest attack took place on Jan. 9 in Duhok. Prime Minister Mohammed al-Sudani has called for greater cooperation to guard Iraq’s borders and has begun including the chief of staff of the Peshmerga, the Kurdish security forces, in National Security Council meetings in Baghdad. In addition, Iran has claimed responsibility for attacking Iranian-Kurdish opposition groups based in Iraqi Kurdistan. This happened in response to the protests in Iran over the killing of Jina “Mahsa” Amini. Iranian authorities attempted to distract and rally citizens around the flag by attacking “separatist” groups and blaming them for recent unrest. Attacks in September killed a pregnant woman in the town of Koye, and ballistic missiles were launched in November, targeting more Iranian-Kurdish opposition groups. In March, Erbil was hit with 12 ballistic missiles but Iran claimed to target Israeli intelligence presence. Iran and Turkey appear to have taken military matters into their own hands, claiming Iraq is incapable of handling the opposition groups that have taken refuge in Iraqi Kurdistan. The past two decades have witnessed a breakdown in Iraqi security capacity in the face of civil war and terrorism. The Iraqi state has been weakened militarily over the years and the training it received from the Global Coalition is focused only on countering ISIS and not on bolstering overall military capabilities. The security set up with the KRG means that Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) have no presence there, despite border security being an important federal matter. The United States has condemned attacks by Iran and Turkey but has done little to prevent their recurrence. Moreover, there has been little cooperation between the ISF and Kurdish Peshmerga forces since the defeat of ISIS. It will be difficult to achieve integration between the ISF and the Kurdish Peshmerga, since the Peshmerga operate as two separate forces — one belonging to the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the other to the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) — despite American military backing premised on the promise of unification. These divisions raise fears of a new civil war, a dangerous development that could spill over into the rest of Iraq. American policymakers need to be wary of the growing division between the KDP and the PUK, which has intensified since the death of former Iraqi President and PUK leader, Jalal Talabani, in 2017. Internal division within the more dominant KDP is also likely to worsen as longtime leader, Masoud Barzani, grows older and more distant from politics. The fight for political dominance between his son, Masrour Barzani, and his nephew, Nechirvan Barzani, may plunge Kurdish politics into further chaos. If a conflict emerges between these potential heirs, it will draw in their allies from the rest of Iraq. Despite Kurdish aspirations to democracy, Iraqi Kurdistan has never held elections on time; the 2022 elections were postponed for one year. Although elections can’t change the dominant political landscape, they can force the two parties to form a government together. A KRG with a renewed legal mandate would enjoy greater legitimacy when dealing with the federal Iraqi government. The Kurdish elections can be held alongside the provincial Iraqi elections in 2023, to save costs and maintain democratic practices. This type of coordination and integration could build trust that leads to the resolution of more sensitive matters, such as border security. Given that Kurdish parties welcome partnership at the federal level, by leading ministries and holding the Iraqi presidency, they should similarly welcome partnership in securing Iraq’s federal borders. Unlike in the past, weak Iraqi borders are hurting the Kurdish region much more than the rest of Iraq. The U.S. should encourage negotiations between Kurdish parties and their counterparts in Baghdad. Recently, the Iranian Foreign Ministry offered to mediate between Baghdad and Iraqi Kurdistan, which undoubtedly would bring Iranian interests to the forefront. Iran’s influence in Iraqi Kurdistan is a concern, especially given that a commemoration of Qassem Suleimani was held in Erbil and Sulaymaniyah and attended by high-level Kurdish officials. Considering this, the U.S. should present itself as an alternate mediator and build upon McGurk’s visit, especially considering American investment in Iraqi democracy.

Read more

The UN representative visited Draw Media

To discuss the elections and freedom of expression, the UN Representative in the Kurdistan Region visited (Draw Media). Ricardo Rodriguez, head of UNAMI office to KR (Kurdistan Region), and Karwan Babakr, Head of UNAMI's Sulaimani Office, visited Darw Office in Sulaimani. The visit was to discuss the issue of elections in the Kurdistan Region and freedom of the press.

Read more

"Iraq in no need of foreign combat forces"

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani says his country is in no need of foreign combat forces on its soil as he visits Berlin to discuss bilateral cooperation in various fields. Speaking in a joint press conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on Friday, Sudani said “Iraqi security forces are capable of defeating terrorism.” “Iraq does not need combat forces from the international coalition,” he said. According to the prime minister, Baghdad is reviewing the size and type of remaining advisory forces that remain in the country. Some 2,500 US troops still remain inside the Arab country in what Washington describes as an “advisory” mission. US President Joe Biden and Iraq’s then-Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi declared in July 2021 that the US mission in Iraq would transition from combat to an “advisory” role by the end of that year. After the 2020 assassination of Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the deputy head of the Popular Mobilization Units, along with the region’s legendary anti-terror commander, Iranian Lieutenant General Qassem Soleimani, Iraqi lawmakers ratified a bill that required the government to end the presence of all foreign military forces led by the US.   Iraqi gas export to Germany The German official said they have discussed gas import from Iraq. “We also talked about possible gas deliveries to Germany and agreed to stay in close contact,” he said in the press conference as Berlin is seeking to diversify its energy resources. No further detail on the volume of imported gas from Iraq has been revealed yet. Speaking about the energy ties, Sudani said Iraq wants to help meet global energy needs while also stimulating its domestic economy. He added that Iraq’s gas can be delivered to Europe through Turkey. He said German companies could help Iraqi with the problem of gas flaring. Iraq continues to flare some of the gas extracted alongside crude oil because it lacks the facilities to process it into fuel for local consumption or exports. Opportunities, he maintained, have been offered to German firms to invest in Iraq’s gas industry. Iraq has also signed a deal with German company Siemens to upgrade its power grid. The deal aims to increase Iraq’s power generation by 11 gigawatts. “Iraq is already one of the countries most affected by the climate crisis, and the challenges will continue to grow in the coming years,” Scholz said, adding that Germany wants to help Iraq diversify its economy from fossil fuels and reduce its carbon footprint, including through the use of solar power and hydrogen.

Read more

Slemani is going to run out of electricity

On 15/12/1992, Ahmad Bamarne, a member of the first round of the Kurdistan Parliament, wrote to his wife in France: "The situation in Kurdistan is very bad. There is only two or three hours of electricity. Currently, some areas of Sulaimani have only (2) hours of electricity , in (24) hours. When In 1992, three hours of electricity was given to the citizens a day, "The reason is said to be “due to injustice in the distribution of electricity” According to an official statement of the government, the monthly expenditure of electricity is (100) billion dinars, the cost of installing electricity smart meter was (300) billion dinars. About (70) billion dinars monthly expenditure on generator rent which is paid directly by the citizens and the expenditure of the Ministry of Electricity for the generators is (17) billion dinars, but still there is no electricity. From (1992 to 2022) Currently, the electricity is reduced to the lowest distribution level in the Kurdistan Region. Electricity will be provided between 6 to 8 hours in average. However,some areas in Sulaimani have only (2-4) hours of electricity. Experts and electricity officials, attributs the reason to (injustice in the distribution of electricity and ownership of Sulaimani that there is no one to defend).   Demands on electricity According to the official statements of the Ministry of Electricity, currently (3600) MW of electricity is produced in the Kurdistan Region, but the demand for electricity has increased to more than (6600) MW. While the official website of the Ministry of Electricity earlier this month announced that "615 megawatts of electricity has been increased in the ninth cabinet" and power plants are opened daily and talk about increasing the amount of electricity production, but yet the government provides only (7) hours of electricity for the citizens. Smart meters reduce electricity supply! In May this year, a delegation from the Republic of Congo visited the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRG) and met with the Minister of Electricity, Kamal Mohammed. At the time, the Ministry of Electricity claimed that the smart meter project had reduced electricity waste from 49% to 39%. Kamal Mohammed is the electricity minister on KDP share in the government. He recently took over another ministry. He was appointed as acting minister of natural resources following the resignation of Kamal Atroshi. There are 1.7 million electricity customers in the Kurdistan Region, of which 1.3 million have installed smart meters, which is 73% of the total number of electricity customers.  Electricity supply has been reduced from 16 hours to 6 hours, contrary to the statements of the Ministry of Electricity, smart meters have reduced the time of electricity supply by 62%, while the cost of installing smart meters was about 300 billion dinars. Electricity income and expenditure There is a huge amount of money is spent on electricity in the Kurdistan Region, so that now more than (100) billion dinars are spent monthly for the companies that produce electricity. In addition to the cost of electricity generation, the total monthly salary expenditure of the Ministry of Electricity (17 billion 850 million dinars), in addition to the money citizens spend monthly to buy electricity from private generators. The number of electricity customers in the Kurdistan Region has increased to 1 million 776 thousand 963. If an average of (4) amps per household of electricity from private generators is calculated and the price of each ampere is calculated at (10,000) dinars, then each family spends an average of (40) thousand dinars monthly to buy electricity from private generators, the average monthly expenditure of citizens to buy electricity from private generators reaches (71 billion) dinars. Accordingly, the total cost of electricity in the Kurdistan Region, including the government's payment and the citizens' payment for generator rent, is more than (200 billion) dinars per month. This expenditure comes at a time when, according to the statistics of the Ministry of Electricity, the monthly electricity revenue is about (50 billion) dinars. Last year, the total electricity revenue was (456 billion) dinars. Currently, the government owes about 1.298 trillion dinars to citizens and the government itself owes the companies $3.883 billion.

Read more

Last month, 38 percent of the Kurdistan Region's oil was sold to Israel

Last month, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) sold 38 percent of its oil to Israel and 10 percent to China. The Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) sold 12 million 255 thousand barrels of oil last month, of which 4 million 650 thousand barrels were sold to Israel, that was 38% of its oil sold in December.  Croatia bought 2.23 million barrels, about 18 percent of oil from the Kurdistan Region last month. Italy is the third largest buyer of Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) oil, with 1.7 million barrels, that was (14%) of the KRG oil sold in December.  Taiwan bought 2 million barrels of oil from Kurdistan Region last month China bought 1.25 million barrels of oil from Kurdistan Region last month Romania bought 650,000 barrels of oil from Kurdistan Region This table shows the details of the oil sales of the Kurdistan Region for December

Read more

Energy Geopolitics and Conflict between Energy Basins

Draw Media Bahrooz Jaafar Executive Summary Since early 2022, Russia and Iran have been enjoying rising oil and natural gas prices due to the smell of the war in Ukraine. Only one month before the Ukraine war broke out, the US secretary department sent a non-formal massage (non-paper) to each of the energy departments in Greece, Cyprus and Israel's s foreign affairs ministries, announcing that they suspend their support for Eastern Mediterranean Gas Pipeline. This will kill Israel and Cyprus's dream to export natural gas to Europe via the Crete island in Greece! Are these conflicts more energy-related, or do they have historical and political depth? Will natural gas pipelines (the new energy geopolitics) lead to a new common regional cooperation system, or is it a source of conflict and increasing regional problems? This study, from the Mediterranean Institute for Regional Studies, attempts to understand the essence of problems by identifying three main energy basins and showing what the new regional and global energy system will look like. First: Energy security and the world's need for oil and natural gas Energy security means balancing national security with the availability of cheap natural resources to meet domestic needs. According to the US Energy Information Administration, in 1980, the world consumed 53 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, but in 2010, the world consumed 113 trillion cubic feet of natural gas{1}. In 2022, the world's demand for natural gas will reach 146.482 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, which means that the world's demand for natural gas will increase by 4.6% annually{2}. Similarly, in 2010, the world consumed 86.4 million barrels of oil per day, but in 2020, 91 million barrels of oil per day, and in 2022, the world consumed 100.80 million barrels per day{3}. The demand for natural gas and oil has increased: In the simplest terms, this means that oil and natural gas are still the world's top commodities, and millions, if not billions, of cars, planes, ships, factories, power grids, and large and medium-sized industries are still employed. Without natural gas and oil, the global economy would be largely paralyzed. It also means that although humanity has reached the last stage of great progress and innovation in its history, it has yet to find an alternative to oil and natural gas. Just as coal was hugely influential in previous centuries, and then the role became oil, today, natural gas is in the most influential days of its life. In 2022, natural gas has had the strongest impact on international relations: Second: The Caspian Basin: a new Silk Road, a new conflict, a new integration Caspian refers to the world's largest enclosed sea; Iran, Russia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan are located in the Caspian basin. All of them have owned oil and natural gas reserves. Geographically, it lies between Europe and Asia; east of the Caucasus, West of the broad steppe of Central Asia, south of the fertile plains of Southern Russia in Eastern Europe, and north of the mountainous Iranian Plateau of Western Asia (this region is known as the heart of the world. Whoever controls it can control the world){4}. These regional factions have long sought to build an integration like the European Union. After the 2021 tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan, it became clear that Russia has a complete hegemony and ally in the region. 2. 1. Europe will no longer heat itself with Russian gas? However, it can be seen hydrocarbon as a common ground. However, the first third of the world's natural gas reserves are located in Asia: Russia (19.9%) of natural gas and Iran (17.1%) and Qatar (13.1%) in the Arabian Gulf. Although Qatar is a US ally and European natural gas supply, at the same time, Qatar is the Taliban and Iran's ally. By this word, (50.1%) of the world's natural gas reserves are owned by three alliance countries. Fourth is the United States (6.7%), which uses it more for domestic needs{5}. Europe consumes 540 billion cubic meters of gas annually, while Russia supplies 40 per cent of that. The Nord Stream 2 pipeline will transport Russian natural gas to Germany via Ukraine. Ukraine itself is a good beneficiary of taxes on gas pipelines{6}. On September 27, 2022, it was discovered that natural gas had leaked into the water from the North Stream 2 pipeline 70 meters underwater. EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell called the incident deliberate and said the aim was to make natural gas more expensive for Europe; 2-2. Russian-Ukrainian War: Diplomacy failed to prevent war Indeed, this is not a conflict between the two ordinary countries; as we have seen, with the outbreak of the war on February 24 and February 24, 2022, the borders and sovereignty of countries, in general, have faded. This is the collision of at least two great continents, two different civilizations that have been in conflict for thousands of years. Therefore, it is still the beginning of the war, which Russia, Europe, the United States, Britain, China and Ukraine are part of; the spark has reached Taiwan and the Middle East. Is the gas pipeline alone responsible for the huge smoke that has engulfed the world, or where does the problem come from? In 1991, Mikhail Gorbachev declared the fall of the Soviet Union: 16 countries declared independence due to the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The world entered a different phase under the US and NATO presidencies, and Russia accepted the new system on the condition that its current hegemony and borders would be maintained. However, after 1999, the United States and Europe invited Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic to the European Club and made them members of NATO. The United States assured it would not deploy nuclear weapons in these countries, and Russia remained silent. In 2004, US President George W. Bush announced that Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Estonia would become members of NATO. All these countries were formerly under the control of the Soviet Union. The Kremlin, therefore, understood that it should take the threat seriously. Then, in (2008) the US administration, under the direct supervision of Barack Obama and members of Bulgaria, Austria, Turkey and Romania, signed the Nabucco Pipeline project to transport natural gas from Central Asia (from the Caspian region) to Central Europe (They tried to transport gas from the region under Russia's ears without valuing Russia). In 2014, Ukrainian protesters, as media agencies showed that the United States and Europe backed them) forced President Viktor Yanukovych to flee to Moscow and turn his royal palace into a museum. They brought forward another team close to the West and have been trying to make Ukraine a member of NATO for a long time! This time, Russia considered regaining control of the Crimean peninsula. In 2014, they fought Crimea (Crimea: located north of the Black Sea and south of Ukraine, the island has a great military and material position, especially the port of Sevastopol, where most of the world's powers are clashed from here). With the occupation of Crimea, the Western power will no longer be able to receive any military assistance from the Black Sea. In addition, the threat of a NATO-Russian conflict in Crimea disrupted the Nabucco pipeline, especially when the world was busy with the war against terrorism (ISIS). The outbreak of the Syrian crisis in 2011 gave Russia an excuse to cross the Mediterranean Sea: This occurred from the Black Sea to the Marmara, and Russian warships reached the port of Tartus in Syria. Russia is still an important player in the Syrian conflict. The US administration has described China's economic and Russian military incursions as the biggest threat to national security. Therefore, the United States deployed long-range weapons and missiles in Romania (2016) and Poland (2020). Third: Conceptualization and theorizing: A call to securitization theory Theory in international relations helps us to understand phenomena. The securitization theory sparked in 1983 with Barry Buzan's book, "People, State, Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations". Later, Buzan and their colleague established "the Copenhagen School" as an important contribution to the science of international relations. According to this school, national security policy is not natural but carefully formulated by politicians and thinkers{7}. Here, securitization means that when an issue is labeled a "threat" and "danger", the social and political institutions must be provided for it. In other words, security issues do not come from the outside alone but must be addressed from the inside by security actors. For example, indicating "immigrants" as a threat to national security makes "immigrants" a less important issue to be directly addressed at all levels of "borders". This theory emphasizes that issues are not inherently dangerous but that when they are "securitized," they become security problems. This "security" was previously seen in a narrow context as a matter of military confrontation during the Soviet-American Cold War. Then the concept shifted to various levels such as regional security, energy security, environmental security, social security, food security, cyber security, etc. Hence, "issues" or "new phenomena" are considered security threats to culture, identity, economic status and national incomes. When US troops suddenly withdrew from Afghanistan in 2021, in less than a week, the entire Afghanistan, worth (85) billion US$, weapons and military equipment fell into the hands of the Taliban{8}. This made serious questions about the US personality and gave Putin an incentive to impose an energy embargo on Europe and invade Ukraine in a cold winter. Ukraine has been under Russian rule for 200 years. For the Russians, Ukraine is an important part of Russian identity, language, geography and authenticity. From the beginning of the war, the price of oil rose from $ 60 to $ 94; the Wall Street Journal saw the price of oil reach $ 100-120, then reach the same price and more{9}. The European gas crisis and the sale of Russian gas and grain in the country's currency (Ruble) mean that Russia has done its duties successfully. Even the Biden administration has called on OPEC to increase oil production, but OPEC has ignored it from the beginning. Three allies, Russia, China, and Iran, have been prominent factors in global energy prices. On the other hand, another weakness of Europe is that they do not have a unified army; their entire military presence is considered to be NATO, which the United States dominates. Fourth: The gas pipeline in the eastern Mediterranean region Knowing the nature of the distribution of power relations about energy issues depends on recognizing the strategic energy basins and alliances in these regions. This is "energy geopolitics": In 2010, Cyprus and Israel announced that they had discovered underwater natural gas in their offshore borders. In August 2019, Cyprus, Israel and Greece signed a natural gas alliance agreement in Athens with the support of the United States. Even Frank Fannon, the US Assistant Secretary of State for Natural Resources, was present {10}. Egypt, Cyprus, Israel and Greece have established the Eastern Mediterranean Gas Forum (EMGF), AS France, Italy, Spain, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, and Lebanon are also members of the EMGF, and former US Presidents and Secretaries of State Mike Pompeo have expressed strong support for the project. The discovery of the reserves in several major fields concerned Turkey in the southern Mediterranean. A strategic dream has been true in Southern Europe on the other side: Europe does not need Russian natural gas؛. From here on, another pipeline to Europe imports gas from Israel and Cyprus. In early 2021, the 1,900-km East-Med Pipeline has commissioned to transport Israeli and Cypriot natural gas through Greece to Italy, Macedonia, Serbia and other countries. However, this project is very controversial:  - The Cyprus issue remains pending in the region. Turkey does not recognize the Greek Cypriot state and the Turkish part of Cyprus (TRNC) remains marginalized by the international community, which has exacerbated the natural gas problem. The main heads of gas production in the eastern Mediterranean are at odds with Turkey. So, it has been the main cause of regional tension. - Russia is stationed in Syria, and Turkey does not want the northeastern regions of Syria, which contain oil and natural gas reserves, to be under the control of Kurdish forces. - The Mediterranean Sea is the crossroads between three continents: Asia, Africa and Europe (Egypt, Israel, Cyprus, Greece and Turkey). - Environmental problems, migrants, human trafficking, etc., continue in this region. - The deployment of Italian and French warships in the Mediterranean Sea to oppose Turkey's maneuvers. - US and British warships stationed in the Mediterranean basin - The project has led Israel and motivated to become a producer and exporter of natural gas (Israel: imported natural gas from Azerbaijan through Turkish territory in the 1990s and from Egypt from 2008 to 2012). In March 2021, Israel's Delek Drilling sold a 22 per cent stake in the Tamar gas field to UAE's Mubadala Petroleum for more than $1 billion {11}. - the Mediterranean, led by France in Europe and Israel in the Middle East, Britain and the United States, look forward to the oil and gas reserves in Kirkuk and the Kurdistan Region into part of the eastern faction. Therefore, in response to these steps of the West, Russian and Turkish companies are participating in all fields of oil and gas services in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. 4. 1. Why did the US administration withdraw support for the East-Med pipeline project? On January 9 January 9. 2022. the ministries of foreign affairs of Greece, Israel and Cyprus received a non-formal letter from the US secretary department. The letter states that the US administration will suspend its support for the East-Med gas pipeline project, which has sparked regional tensions. The additional gas reserves in the region can be utilized through electricity cables to produce and promote the joint regional project. The letter comes as the United States and Europe have been preparing for a dangerous confrontation with Russia (a month before the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian war). The Eastern Mediterranean Natural Gas Project is immensely important to the United States and the West, so it does not make any excuse for any researcher to believe that support for Europe and the United States will be suspended for this project. However, the following points should be considered: The project has been hurting Turkey for ten years. Therefore, the rumors of suspending US aid are directly related to the Ukraine crisis, a US compromise for Turkey not to get closer to Russia. If the US administration intended to end the project, it would have notified them through the embassies of the three countries in Washington. The US administration believes that the project will bring regional tension and conflict rather than peace and cooperation and has led to the neglect of Turkey in the region. Therefore, Turkey described the US announcement to suspend the EMGF as a great victory for itself. However, Turkey has received this message erroneously because they state that "every line to Europe must pass through Turkey. The United States desire the natural gas projects in the eastern Mediterranean to be in line with European environmental plans and policies. Therefore, they proposed to become an electricity and cable exchange network in the region. The European Union has decided to reduce its use of natural gas by 25 per cent by 2030 and not use it completely by 2050{12}. · The project is expensive and will not solve Europe's energy crisis entirely. Substantially, during the discovery of natural gas, energy giant companies have flocked to the eastern Mediterranean since 2010, such as Noble Energy and Exxon Mobile as the two major US companies, British Petroleum (BP), French Total, Italian Eni, Israeli Delek Drilling, German DEA. Recently, the UAE has devoted all its political, economic and diplomatic strength to the Mediterranean. The UAE has normalized relations with Israel and Turkey. In 2022, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad visited the UAE after 12 years of war and crisis in Syria. Are these signs a simple event and a normal regional step? Is it normal to spend $7 billion and start transporting Cypriot and Israeli natural gas to Greece and other countries in 2021? Fifth: The West and its environmental issues The European Energy Network has announced that it will reach a neutral level of environmental issues by 2050. According to this roadmap, Europe will no longer rely on oil and natural gas (neither exported nor imported). Europe and the Mediterranean countries have had stable agreements since the end of the Cold War; For example, the Barcelona Declaration of 1999: these three continents fall on the same sea; they called it the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership. In 2008, it was renamed the Union for the Mediterranean. According to these agreements, Europe will intervene in any country in the name of cooperation in the Mediterranean Sea, such as Syria, Lebanon, Cyprus, Libya, etc. Therefore, the US administration has called for the Eastern Mediterranean gas project to be conducted by European environmental policies. Establishment of a large joint power line to transport and use excess gas produced off the coast of Cyprus, Israel and Egypt with Greece, thus connecting three neighboring countries on different continents. However, it is not easy because it covers a large area of more than 1,300 miles, and again, this project will cause Turkey's objections. Legally, these waters have an UN-designated exclusive economic zone (EEZ), which mostly passes through Turkey. Experts believe that after the US decision in early 2022, the gas in the eastern Mediterranean will be only for the Mediterranean region, and a certain region will not be economically relevant to Europe. Investors are more likely to follow the statements of Israeli Energy Minister Karin Elharar, who said that in 2022, his office would focus on renewable energy for the production of energy, especially through wind and solar {13}. Sixth: Kurdistan Region of Iraq: Hydrocarbon potential, geographical location, political decisions The population of the Kurdistan Region has exceeded 6 million people, more than 5 million of whom live in cities. 1.4 million people receive salaries from the government, which requires 870 billion Iraqi dinars (about 750 million US dollars) monthly. The armed and security forces of the Kurdistan Region are 270,000 people{14}. However, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) claims to have between 3.7 and 5.3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 45 to 60 billion barrels of oil reserves. Almost the Kurdistan Region ranks between the seventh and ninth-largest natural gas reserves in the world, with between 3% and 5% of the world's natural gas reserves{15}. The existence of hydrocarbon potential for the Kurdistan Region within the framework of the Iraqi state requires deep thinking in the regional chessboard and conflicts: How does the geopolitical aspect of the Kurdistan Region affect its natural reserves? The Kurdistan Region is directly involved in the war between Russia and NATO in the Caspian region. It is also more directly involved in the eastern Mediterranean's energy geopolitics, environment and political conflict. Russian companies are currently operating in Kurdistan Region. Iran is a Russian ally in all areas of the Kurdistan Region, while the Germans have been training the Kurdish forces (Peshmerga) since 2014. The French consider the Kurds their friends, and the US has the largest military base in the Kurdistan Region. In other words, the KRI and its natural gas are located between three different energy geopolitical basins: the Mediterranean Sea in the northwest the Qazvin (Caspian) basin in the east and northeast the Gulf region ( Qatar, UAE and Saudi Arabia) from the south For this reason, if the KRI does not maintain the balance, the Kurdistan energy line will bring chaos to the region. This geopolitical influence is reflected in decision-makers behavior in the Kurdistan Region; When the UAE normalized relations with Israel and Turkey in 2021, the KRG's Prime Minister Masrour Barzani will visit the UAE directly, and then the KRG's President Nechirvan Barzani will visit Turkey. In 2022, when the natural gas and fuel crisis in Europe and the United States due to the war in Ukraine, the Emir of Qatar visited the United States; following this, the Prime Minister of the KRG arrived in Doha on February 15, 2022, at the invitation of Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani. As well as, during his participation in the 2022 global energy forum –Atlantic Council, the PM of the KRG pointed out that "We will also export natural gas to Baghdad, Turkey and Europe" he said Atlantic Council's Global Energy Forum in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE), March 28, 2022{16}. Moreover, Our goal is to export Kurdistan's gas to Europe," said Deputy Prime Minister Qubad Talabani at the Delphi Economic Forum in Athens in April 2022. The Islamic Republic targeted the residence of Sheikh Baz Karim Barzanji, the executive director of Kar group company, with 16 missiles. Further to remind, 60% of the Kurdistan oil pipeline is owned by Kar company, and Rosneft owns 40% of Kurdistan and its oil marketing. So, Russia and Iran will never want the Kurdistan Region's natural gas to replace Iranian gas for Iraq, nor become it facilitates for Europe. Subsequently, in June and July 2022, militia armed groups targeted the Kormor field three times (Kor Mor is the largest natural gas and LPG field in the Kurdistan Region, operated by UAE Pearl Petroleum since 2007). The Kurdistan Region can work to maintain its balance of power and neutrality; Perhaps the best scenario is for the Kurdistan Region to exercise its power and validities within the framework of the Iraqi Constitution, Articles 111, 112, 116 and 122, as well as Law No. 22 of 2005 on the Oil and Gas Law which is issued in the Kurdistan Parliament in (2007). Iraq is not a stable country. The Kurdistan Region should take every opportunity to work with the central government to pass an oil and gas law with the support of the US administration (because Iraq still needs an oil and gas law). This opportunity is also important for the Iraqi central government; instead of importing natural gas from Iran at higher market prices, or instead of demanding electricity from Jordan, Egypt and the Gulf, Kurdistan's gas should be used inside Iraq to generate electricity for central and southern provinces of Iraq: It is geographically closer, it is cheaper, it will be implemented within one country, it will lead to more political coexistence, and the Shiite militias close to Iran may not repeat the threats and shelling of the Kurdistan Region's fields. "Everywhere, the oil and gas is not only related to oil and gas in terms of chemical composition and geological dimensions, not only an economic issue but also an environmental, security, political and geopolitical issue. So, It is not an exaggeration to say, "Tell me where the pipeline is going, and I will tell you where your political destiny is going". Conclusion Finally, so-called "energy security" is generally related to the reasons for the world's high and low prices of oil and natural gas. All three main basins of the Caspian, the Gulf, and the eastern Mediterranean are direct threats to global economic and political security. The US administration's decision to withdraw their support for the EMG project in January 2022 was a tactic through an unofficial paper. This is further confirmed by signing a new deal between Israel, Egypt and the European Union in June 2022 to export gas from the eastern Mediterranean. As the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen said the EU would use Cypriot and Israeli natural gas as an alternative to Russian gas. However, the European Union and the United States will continue their environmental programs to reduce their dependence on oil and natural gas. Pressure on OPEC will continue to supply much more amount of oil. All this does not mean that by mid-2023, we will see oil prices below $70, But in 2024, we will see oil prices below $40. However, natural gas will be the main market and geopolitical conflict topic for many years. Therefore, it is better for developing oil-producing countries such as Iraq, which suffers from unnatural political conflict and violence, to take advantage of this temporary opportunity. Finally, one of the main characteristics that distinguish the Russia and Ukraine war from other world wars is that instead of only a great military, economic, financial and political impact on the two direct countries participating in the war, the war has also created great political, economic and security pressure on those indirectly involved in the war.      Click here to PDF  References {1} US. Energy Information Administration (2012) Global natural gas consumption doubled from 1980 to 2010. For more: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=5810 {2} Jazeera Net (2019) How much oil do we consume?.. Facts about black gold in the world. For more click here (Translated from Arabic to English language).    https://www.aljazeera.net › 2019 › كم... {3} Statista (2021) Daily global crude oil demand 2006-2026 – Statista {4} Mammadyarov, E (2007) "A new way for the Caspian region: cooperation and integration". Turkish Policy Quarterly (TPQ). P 2-8. {5} Henderson, S (2022) "Reality Check for Israel’s Natural Gas Plans", The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. {6}Reuters (2021) Explainer: Why Russian exports hold sway over European and British gas prices. See here: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/why-russian-exports-hold-sway-over-european-british-gas-prices-2021-11-03/  {7} Stritzel. H (2014) Securitization Theory and the Copenhagen School. Palgrave Macmillan, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137307576_2 {8} The hill (2022) McCaul says US withdrawal from Afghanistan has emboldened Russia on Ukraine {9} WSJ (2022) What’s Behind Wall Street’s $100 Oil Forecast? {10} Barkey, J (2022) US pipeline withdrawal marks new chapter in Eastern Mediterranean. Ekathimerini:https: //www.ekathimerini.com/opinion/1176904/us-pipeline-withdrawal-marks-new-chapter-in-eastern-mediterranean/ {11} Bloomberg (2021) UAE-Israel Ties Deepen as Mubadala Buys Gas Stake for $1 Billion . see here: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-02/uae-israel-ties-deepen-as-mubadala-buys-gas-stake-for-1-billion {12} Henderson, S (2022). (OP. Cit). {13} I24 News (2021) Energy Minister: Israel wants to focus on renewable energy: https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/politics/1639586438-energy-minister-israel-wants-to-focus-on-renewable-energy {14} Rudaw (2021) Ministry of Planning: The population of the Kurdistan Region is 6.17 million (translated from Kurdish to English language) see here: https://www.rudaw.net/arabic/kurdistan/180120214 {15} Mediterranean Institute for Regional Studies (2020) Stubborn Kurdish Petroleum Resources: Surveying Actual data and investigating the declared Numbers. Research Paper {16} Daily Sabah (2022) KRG in Iraq to start energy exports to Turkey soon: PM Barzani. https://www.dailysabah.com/business/energy/krg-in-iraq-to-start-energy-exports-to-turkey-soon-pm-barzani

Read more

All Contents are reserved by Draw media.
Developed by Smarthand