Draw Media
هه‌واڵ / جیهان

How did Trump win and what is next for the Kurdistan Region?

Winthrop Rodgers After a year of primary and general election campaigning, voters in the US picked Republican Donald Trump over Democrat Kamala Harris. Trump, who was running to retake the office that he held between 2017 and 2021, won with 312 electoral votes. Harris managed just 226. The former president is also expected to win the popular vote, which he failed to do in the 2016 election. The final results will be confirmed in the next few weeks. Trump’s victory came as a result of sweeping all seven major swing states: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada. While he went beyond the narrow margins that had been anticipated, the election was still decided by just a fraction of the more than 146 million votes cast. Across those seven states, Trump won fewer than 800,000 more votes than Harris based on the preliminary numbers. He won just 255,000 more votes in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, a combination that would have gotten her to 270 electoral votes. Overall, there was a broad shift to the right across the US. While Democrats continued to win women, Blacks, and university-educated voters. More conservative demographics like men, Whites, and working class voters continued to cast ballots for Republican candidates and did so at higher rates than in the past. The rightward shift was most pronounced among young men, Whites, Latino men, and voters aged 45-64 years old. In particular, voters seemed to be reacting against the high cost of living in the US. While the administration of President Joe Biden has been successful at bringing down inflation, spurring economic growth, and reinvigorating the industrial sector, the effects were not felt by ordinary people who are still grappling with the economic fall-out of the COVID-19 pandemic. Many economists have questioned Trump’s proposed plans, but voters’ anger was real. Moreover, Trump used racist and sexist grievances and stoked a narrative that Biden had mishandled immigration as a way to motivate his base. While these trends prevailed at the presidential level, Democrats had a better, but still disappointing night, in races for the Senate, the House of Representatives, and state-level races. They lost control of the Senate after Republicans flipped seats in West Virginia, Montana, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. As of writing, control of the House remains unclear, but Republicans look likely to retain control. Voters in the US also make choices about policy questions at the ballot box. In a number of cases, they rejected Democratic candidates for office, but embraced Democratic-backed initiatives. For example, there were ballot measures in ten states to protect abortion and reproductive rights, including several places where harsh abortion restrictions were put in place after the Supreme Court invalidated Roe v. Wade. These were approved in seven states, but failed to pass in three. In Florida, the pro-choice measure achieved a majority, but was unable to reach the 60% of the vote needed to become law. As a result of the election, the US continues to be one of the only major Western countries never to select a woman as its top political leader. The so-called “highest glass-ceiling in the nation” remains cracked, but unbroken.   How will the result affect the Kurds? Observers in from around the world watched the US election closely, including in the Kurdistan Region. This is understandable given the stakes: what the next president decides to do will have significant bearing on its future. Now that the result is known and Trump will be returning to the White House, Kurds are wondering what that means. Given that he was previously the president, there is a precedent for what he might do. Kurds will of course remember his administration’s opposition to the 2017 independence referendum in the Kurdistan Region and his personal actions to enable Turkey’s invasion of northeastern Syria during Operation Peace Spring. But that is no guarantee that he will do the same thing. Trump is famously transactional and prone to changing his mind based on emotion. The leaders of the Kurdistan Region’s main political parties—who have much work to do themselves in terms of forming a government following their own election—were quick to congratulate Trump on his victory. They emphasized the bond between the US and the Kurdistan Region and a desire to strengthen it. However, the relationship between the US and the Kurdistan Region is changing, particularly on the security front. By mid-way through Trump’s term in 2026, the International Coalition will withdraw its forces from bases in the Kurdistan Region, including Erbil and Harir. Moreover, the four-year memorandum of understanding regarding Peshmerga reform will expire that same year. These will have to be dealt with in due time and Baghdad will have a significant say in the matter, particularly in terms of the bases. Much of Trump’s Middle East policy will depend on who he selects for key positions at the State Department and the Pentagon. His first term was characterized by confrontation with Iran and many of the names being floated for those jobs have hawkish views about Tehran. While politically this may prove popular among some Kurds, many others understand that it is often the Kurdistan Region that is caught in the crossfire when the US and Iran clash. This is all the more relevant in the context of regional tensions regarding Israel, which Trump is expected to support even more than Biden. However, Trump also ran on a platform of keeping the US out of foreign conflicts. “'I’m not going to start wars, I’m going to stop wars,” he said in his post-election victory speech. Obviously, this is more easily said than done and Trump thrives on aggression. Only time will tell whether this was merely a talking point to get elected. But this is all at the geopolitical level. There is little chance that the next administration increases its attention on the Kurdistan Region; in fact, its focus will probably continue to shift away from the problems of Erbil and Sulaymaniyah. Practically, this means that the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) will appeal to Washington when they feel that it is in their interest, but ignore it when they want. That will likely have a destabilizing effect inside the Kurdistan Region and enable further democratic backsliding and freedom of expression violations.

Read more

Linking the Eastern Mediterranean and Gulf Energy Hubs: The Expanding US Strategic Role

Bahrooz Jaafar Exclusive Summary: The Eastern Mediterranean basin, encompassing Cyprus, Egypt, Greece, Israel, the Palestinian territories, Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, and Turkey, has emerged since the late 2000s as a focal point of energy competition, ideological struggles, historical conflicts, and rising regional ambitions. This region forms part of a broader geopolitical landscape where the interests of the United States, the European Union, Russia, and China intersect. Increasingly, the Eastern Mediterranean and the Gulf are merging into a single geopolitical sphere, becoming arenas for both regional competition and the influence of global powers, especially as the United States seeks to curtail the spread of Chinese dominance. Simultaneously, the wars in Ukraine and Gaza have crucial consequences for the global and regional order.   Security and Energy Dynamics in the Eastern Mediterranean Since 2009, gas discoveries in the Eastern Mediterranean have sparked speculation about significant geopolitical shifts. These discoveries have transformed Israel from a gas importer to an exporter, elevated Cyprus as a regional energy player, and fostered a trilateral alliance between Greece, Israel, and Cyprus. To this effect, the Eastern Mediterranean Gas Forum (EMGF) was formed in 2019, which includes seven countries bordering the Eastern Mediterranean, along with the European Union, the United States, and the UAE as observers. Despite Turkey's significant regional presence and location in the Eastern Mediterranean, it has been excluded from these regional gas activities, intensifying regional tensions.   Notable gas fields such as Tamar (2009) and Leviathan (2010) in Israel's offshore borders, Aphrodite off the coast of Cyprus (2011), Zohr in Egypt (2015), and later discoveries like Calypso in Cyprus and Karish in Israel, raised hopes that these reserves would promote economic cooperation and ease political tensions. However, this optimism has not appropriately materialized. Geopolitical tensions persist due to overlapping maritime claims and border disputes, especially between Lebanon and Israel, the ongoing Israel- Palestine conflicts, as well as Turkey’s incursions into Greek waters, and the unsolved Cyprus problem. These issues, involving both sovereign rights and economic interests, continue to impede economic cooperation. Turkey’s refusal to recognize Cyprus’ sovereignty further exacerbates the geopolitical tensions. Since 2018, there have been plans to build a 1,900-kilometer underwater gas pipeline from the Cypriot and Israeli gas fields to the Greek island of Crete, with a projected completion date of 2025. However, this project has encountered a range of geopolitical, financial, and environmental challenges. The purpose of this pipeline is to reduce Europe's reliance on Russian gas by transporting 9-12 billion cubic meters annually, which would cover about 10% of Europe's energy needs. The Eastern Mediterranean is also expected to be a key region for Europe's security and energy strategy. It is essential to remember that the Mediterranean basin is not solely a hub for oil and gas extraction and export. Beyond its role in trade and economic activities, the region is intricately linked to Europe's security landscape. Millions of migrants from the Middle East and North Africa cross the Mediterranean to reach Europe, contributing to a migration crisis that has fueled identity struggles across the continent. This issue has played a key role in the electoral success of right-wing and populist parties in several European countries. The Missing Link in the BRI: Connecting the Gulf to the Eastern Mediterranean The Gulf’s engagement in Eastern Mediterranean affairs has played a pivotal role in shaping recent developments, particularly through the participation of the Gulf's national oil companies. These companies have spearheaded the Gulf Arab states’ increasing presence in the region as part of their internationalization strategies. Among the three Gulf powers, the UAE has taken the lead in establishing a significant role in the Eastern Mediterranean. Its involvement in Libya and Egypt, alongside its deepening ties with Cyprus and Greece, highlights this strategic focus.   The Abraham Accords, signed with Israel in 2020, further cemented the UAE's influence in the Eastern Mediterranean, blending both soft and hard power strategies during this period. The Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) and Mubadala Petroleum, both based in Abu Dhabi, have been at the forefront of the UAE's bid to secure a dominant position in the Eastern Mediterranean energy sector. In September 2021, Mubadala Petroleum acquired a 22% stake in Israel’s Tamar gas field for $1 billion. Additionally, Mubadala owns 10% of Egypt’s largest gas field, Zohr. In February 2023, ADNOC Distribution, the UAE’s largest fuel and service retailer, purchased a 50% stake in TotalEnergies Egypt, marking Abu Dhabi’s significant entry into Egypt as part of its broader regional expansion plans. Moreover, ADNOC is actively partnering with BP to develop new gas fields in the Mediterranean, and both companies have agreed to purchase New Med, the largest shareholder in Israel’s Leviathan gas field. Although the ongoing Gaza war complicates the deal, the UAE’s ambitions remain evident. Its policy starkly contrasts with that of Iran and its allied groups in the region, as well as with the Muslim Brotherhood, of which Hamas is a part. In February 2024, Egyptian officials signed a $35 billion agreement with the UAE to develop the Ras al-Hikma resort on Egypt's north coast. This deal provided a crucial boost to Egypt's struggling economy by injecting much-needed foreign currency, which led to a sharp decline in black-market activity amid Egypt’s currency and economic crisis. The project also promises to increase Gulf tourism and wealth flows to these coastal areas. In my latest book, Deciphering the Eastern Mediterranean's Hydrocarbon Dynamics: Unraveling Regional Shifts (published by Emerald Group Publishing in Europe and the United States), I explore these developments in detail. I argue that not all economic and security issues in the region are tied solely to oil and gas. Instead, these factors form part of a broader geopolitical shift in which both the Gulf states and Israel pursue their agendas. Natural gas has indeed become a central issue in international relations, especially in light of the Ukraine war. Although the majority of cars in Europe are battery-powered and the world as a whole has turned to clean energy, we are now in the energy transition phase, but oil and gas still dominate the global economic market.   Before and after the Ukraine war, the European Union has clarified that it aims to replace Russian gas with Eastern Mediterranean gas (from the reserves of Israel, Egypt, and Cyprus) to reduce the West's dependence on Russian energy. As a result, the Eastern Mediterranean region needs to promote greater integration with the energy-rich Gulf states. While progress has been made, the ongoing Gaza war and the presence of Militia forces aligned with Iran in the region could complicate this effort. Moreover, as the war in Ukraine continues, Russia may increasingly align itself with Iran's interests in the region. Meanwhile, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), also known in China as One Belt, One Road, or the New Silk Road, is a global infrastructure development strategy adopted by the Chinese government in 2013. It aims to invest in more than 150 countries and international organizations. According to the 2024 report from the Center for Finance and Green Development, based on official Chinese media, by April 2023, a total of 149 countries (including China) had signed agreements to join China's Belt and Road Initiative. China has strengthened its strategic and economic relationships in the Gulf, with economic ties between China and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) increasing by 140 percent between 2015 and 2022. According to Commerce and Industry Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Hamad Bin Qassim Al-Sani, who led a Qatari delegation to a conference in Xiamen, China, on May 23, 2024, titled "Embracing the Future: Promoting Industrial Cooperation and High-Quality Investment between China and the GCC," trade between China and the GCC reached approximately $23.7 billion in 2023, with an expected growth rate of 3.7% in 2024. China’s growing soft power in Asia, particularly in Iraq and the Gulf, poses a significant challenge to U.S. unipolar dominance. However, the Gulf, especially Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Oman remains a cornerstone of U.S. and British policy in the region. These nations still rely on the U.S. for security, particularly against threats from Iran and pro-Iranian groups in the surrounding region. Connecting the Gulf to the Eastern Mediterranean will be part of a broader U.S. strategy to curb the expansion of Chinese influence in the Indo-Pacific region, which is anchored by U.S. partnerships with India, Japan, and Australia. Additionally, the expressway from the Port of Duqm to Saudi Arabia is nearing completion, as is Saudi Arabia’s access to the Mediterranean coast with the support of Jordan.   Conclusion Many of the world's most complex problems are concentrated in the Eastern Mediterranean. These include the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the Syrian crisis, the unresolved Cyprus dispute, which increases Turkey's involvement in the region, as well as issues like immigration, environmental degradation, the Lebanese conflict, and drug trafficking. In general, The war in Gaza is really matters for the Eastern- Mediterranean. Addressing these issues might require decisive action, though military solutions alone may not be sufficient. In the Middle East, Israel, Iran, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia are considered the major regional powers. Turkey's collapsing economy limits its ability to project power or engage in conflict, as its internal economic challenges take precedence. This doesn't allow Turkey to enter a war abroad because they will face collapse inside. Meanwhile, the Gulf states, particularly Saudi Arabia and the UAE, are focused on diversifying their economies and continue to view Iran as a significant threat.    With strong support from the West, Israel is moving to keep the threats away posed by Hamas and Hezbollah, aiming to protect its key economic assets such as ports and gas fields. The Eastern Mediterranean holds immense strategic value for Western powers, and they seek a reliable and influential ally in the region -Israel fills this role. Therefore, ongoing conflict is inevitable, and it could be prolonged, given the resilience of groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. These groups have shown the ability to recover and renew their activities after being targeted, posing recurring threats to U.S. and Israeli interests.   Bahrooz Jaafar holds a Ph.D. in International Relations from Cyprus International University, Nicosia. He is the founder and head of the Mediterranean Institute for Regional Studies. His latest academic book, “Deciphering the Eastern Mediterranean's Hydrocarbon Dynamics: Unraveling Regional Shifts,” was published by Emerald Group Publishing. Dr. Jaafar is originally from the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Email: [email protected]

Read more

From Beijing to Erbil: China's 75th Anniversary: Insights for the Kurdistan

China’s progress over the last 75 years has been remarkable. From a largely agrarian economy in the mid-20th century, China has become the second-largest economy in the world, largely due to its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which has fostered international trade and infrastructure development. The Kurdistan Region, a rapidly growing area within Iraq, can learn from China’s economic model—particularly in diversifying its economy beyond oil, enhancing its industrial base, and attracting foreign investment.The BRI offers the Kurdistan Region a gateway to new infrastructure investments, trade partnerships, and technology transfers. By aligning itself with China’s global economic vision, Kurdistan can improve its connectivity with international markets and bolster its role as a commercial hub within Iraq and the wider Middle East. Chinese companies are already active in the region, contributing to sectors like energy and construction. Kurdistan can deepen its ties with China to accelerate development in critical sectors such as technology, telecommunications, and manufacturing.China’s vast investments in infrastructure, both domestically and abroad, demonstrate its commitment to modernization. From high-speed rail networks to smart cities and green energy projects, China has transformed the landscape of its cities and can serve as a model for Kurdistan,Connection to Kurdistan:  The Kurdistan Region is focused on rebuilding and expanding its infrastructure, particularly in transportation, energy, and housing. China’s experience in developing megaprojects could be crucial for enhancing Kurdistan’s infrastructure, improving the quality of life for its citizens, and attracting foreign investment. Additionally, by partnering with China, the region can access cutting-edge innovations in renewable energy, telecommunications, and digital economy infrastructure, supporting its ambitions to become a technological leader in Iraq.Over 75 years, China has preserved its rich cultural heritage while embracing modernization. The promotion of Confucian values, the arts, and cultural diplomacy has made China a global cultural powerhouse. Similarly, the Kurdistan Region should strive to promote its identity while engaging in cultural exchange,China and Kurdistan have established cultural ties through events like the China-Kurdistan Cultural Weeks, language programs, and student exchanges. Expanding these exchanges will foster mutual understanding and promote tourism and education in both regions. The expansion of Mandarin language programs in Kurdish universities could allow more Kurdish students to study in China, bringing back valuable knowledge that could benefit various sectors of the Kurdish economy. Cultural diplomacy through arts, heritage preservation, and joint exhibitions could further strengthen the bonds between the two regions.China’s journey has focused on achieving sovereignty, national unity, and stability while emerging as a major global player. The Kurdistan Region, facing its own challenges related to autonomy, security, and regional stability, can find inspiration in China’s path to success.Just as China prioritized national unity and stability to enable its rise, the Kurdistan Region can work on consolidating its governance structures, ensuring peace and stability as a foundation for economic development and international cooperation. China has played a significant role in regional security, offering political support and engaging in diplomatic efforts to resolve conflicts in the Middle East. Continued diplomatic engagement between China and Kurdistan can help address local security concerns, promote regional stability, and facilitate reconstruction efforts in Iraq.China’s global rise has been characterized by fostering diplomatic partnerships and participating in international forums that support global peace and development. Its strategic alignment with regions around the world, including the Middle East, has grown. The Kurdistan Region, through its cooperation with China, can leverage this partnership for both regional stability and economic growth.   Halo Hassan Saeed -Halo Hassan Saeed is a writer and journalist, a member of the International Union of Journalists, and the author of two books on the People's Republic of China. His work focuses on fostering cultural understanding and promoting awareness of Chinese influence in the region.

Read more

The US election will come down to the “swing states,” but Harris has an advantage over Trump

Draw Media, Winthrop Rodgers US voters will go to the polls on November 5 to elect a new president. The Republican Party selected former President Donald Trump, who is seeking to recapture the post that he lost in 2020. The man who beat him, President Joe Biden, dramatically declined to continue his reelection campaign earlier this summer in response to concerns about his age. Instead, the Democratic Party nominated Vice President Kamala Harris. She will become the first woman to be US president if she wins. With just a few weeks to go, the race is close. Observers from Kurdistan, Iraq, and around the world are wondering what will happen. For many people, the process of the US election can be confusing, but it helps to keep a few key aspects in mind. The US has a federal system of government and it uses what is known as the “Electoral College” to determine who becomes president. Each state is given a number of electoral votes, which are roughly proportional to the size of its population. For example, California is the largest state and has the most electoral votes with 54, while smaller states like Wyoming and Vermont only have three. To win the presidency a candidate must get at least 270 electoral votes. The total number of votes that a candidate receives from across the entire country — known as the “popular vote” — is irrelevant. In fact, in two of the last six cycles — George W. Bush 2000 and Trump in 2016 — the winner got fewer votes overall, but was still elected because they got more electoral votes. Most states give all of their electoral votes to whoever wins the state, although there are two exceptions. The parties want to come first in as many states as they can, especially if they have large populations like New York or Texas. However, there are many states with clear political leanings and the outcome can be predicted ahead of time. For example, Democrats are almost certain to win in places like Massachusetts, while Republicans will definitely win Tennessee. Each cycle there are a few “swing states” that could go either way. With the US pretty evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats, how these states vote becomes extremely important. They are where the contest will be decided. In 2024, there are seven swing states where either candidate has a good chance of winning: Pennsylvania (which has 19 electoral votes), North Carolina (16), Georgia (16), Michigan (15), Arizona (11), Wisconsin (10), and Nevada (6). Harris and Trump will hold many rallies in these states and spend lots of money on TV advertisements to convince voters to support them. Whoever can win in enough of the right states in this group will become president. At the moment, Harris has a slight edge in polling averages, which change as new surveys are added. As of writing, she is currently leading in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. These three states alone have enough electoral votes to get her to 270 and secure the White House. She is also leading in Nevada. Trump has a slight edge in Arizona, North Carolina, and Georgia, but these will not be enough to win. However, he still has a decent shot at winning if Harris stumbles. The race remains extremely close. Pennsylvania is particularly important for both campaigns. It has a lot of electoral votes — more than any of the other swing states — and a history of voting for both Republican and Democratic candidates for president, congress, and at the state level. It has two major cities, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. These are vote-rich areas because of their large populations. Many young people, Blacks, and members of labor unions live there and they vote overwhelmingly for Democrats. In between these two cities, there are vast rural areas, where voters tend to be strongly Republican. Many people here are White and are more conservative than the voters in the cities. There are also suburbs and smaller cities that have a mix of voters. Harris will need to win by very large margins in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh and do well in their suburbs in order to off-set Trump’s strength in rural parts of the state. If she can do this, she will win Pennsylvania — and most likely the White House. On September 10, Trump and Harris debated each other in Philadelphia. They clashed on a variety of topics, including the economy, immigration, abortion, and foreign policy. Polling afterwards showed that more voters thought Harris did a better job because she appeared calm, empathetic, and prepared. In contrast, Trump focused heavily on fears about the impact of immigrants and spouted racist lies. He was widely criticized, including by members of his own party. The debate exposed a stark contrast between the two candidates among voters, many of whom are just now starting to pay attention to the election. It will merely reinforce the preexisting preferences of Democrats and Republicans, but Trump seems to have hurt himself among undecided voters with his poor performance. He has, in fact, refused to debate Harris again, likely to avoid getting embarrassed a second time. There is still a month and a half to go before the election on November 5. This is a long time in politics and many things can change in the meantime. Moreover, polling does not necessarily provide the full picture, as was the case when Trump was first elected in 2016. For now, however, it looks like Harris has a slight advantage based on polling in key swing states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. She also has greater momentum than Trump coming out of the debate. But keep a close eye on the swing states over the next several weeks. That is where the race will be won or lost.

Read more

Major oil companies' profits in the second quarter of 2024

🔹 In the second quarter of (2024) seven major oil and gas companies such as; (Exxon Mobil, Chevron, TotalEnergies, Shell, BP, Equinor and Eni) posted a profit of $26.325 billion, up 2 percent from $25.848 billion in the second quarter of 2023. 🔹 In the second quarter of this year, Exxon Mobil alone had revenue of more than (9 billion) dollars, while the company's profit in the second quarter of last year was (7 billion 880 million) dollars. 🔹 In the second quarter of this year, Chevron's profit decreased by (26%), compared to the same period last year, while the Italian company "Eni" profit increased by (125%), compared to the second quarter of (2023).

Read more

The Kurdish smuggler that is wanted by European countries

I am sitting in a shopping mall in Iraq, face-to-face with one of Europe’s most notorious people-smugglers. His name is Barzan Majeed, and he is wanted by police forces in several countries, including the UK. Over the course of our conversation - both here and the next day at his office - he says he does not know how many migrants he has transported across the English Channel. “Maybe a thousand, maybe 10,000. I don’t know, I didn’t count.” The meeting is the culmination of what had seemed like an impossible task a few months earlier. Together with Rob Lawrie, a former soldier who works with refugees, I had set out to find and question the man known as Scorpion. For several years, he and his gang controlled much of the people-smuggling trade - in boats and lorries - across the English Channel. More than 70 migrants have died making the crossing by boat since 2018 - last month, five people were killed off the French coast, including a seven-year-old girl. It is a dangerous journey, but for the smugglers it can be very lucrative. They can charge £6,000 per person for a boat crossing - and with nearly 30,000 people attempting it in 2023, the potential for profit is obvious. Our interest in Scorpion had begun with a little girl we met in one of the migrant camps near Calais, in northern France. She had almost died trying to cross the English Channel in an inflatable dinghy. The dinghy was not seaworthy - it was cheap, bought second-hand in Belgium - and the 19 people on board had no lifejackets. Who would send people out to sea like this? When police in the UK pick up illegal migrants, they take and inspect their mobile phones. From 2016 onwards, the same number kept cropping up. Often it would be stored under the name “Scorpion”. Sometimes it would be stored as a picture of a scorpion. Martin Clarke, a senior investigating officer at the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) told us that officers started to realise “Scorpion” referred to a Kurdish Iraqi man called Barzan Majeed. As a 20-year-old in 2006, Majeed had himself been smuggled into England in the back of a lorry. Despite being refused leave to remain a year later, he stayed several more years in the UK - some of it in prison for gun and drug offences. He was finally deported to Iraq in 2015. Shortly after this, it is believed that Majeed “inherited” a people-smuggling business from his elder brother, who was serving a jail sentence in Belgium. Majeed became known as Scorpion. Between 2016 and 2021, Scorpion's gang is believed to have controlled much of the people-smuggling trade between Europe and the UK. A two-year international police operation resulted in convictions for 26 members of the gang at courts in the UK, France and Belgium. But Scorpion himself evaded arrest and went on the run. In his absence, he was tried in a Belgian court and convicted of 121 counts of people-smuggling. In October 2022, he was sentenced to 10 years in jail and fined €968,000 (£834,000). Since then, Scorpion’s whereabouts were unknown. This was the mystery we wanted to crack. A contact of Rob introduced us to an Iranian man who said he dealt with Scorpion when he had been trying to get across the Channel. Scorpion had told the Iranian he was based in Turkey, from where he was co-ordinating his business remotely. In Belgium, we tracked down Majeed’s elder brother - now out of jail. He also said Scorpion was likely to be in Turkey.   For most migrants heading to the UK, Turkey is an important staging post. Because of its immigration laws, it is relatively easy to get a visa to enter the country from Africa, Asia and the Middle East. A tip-off led us to a cafe in Istanbul frequented by people-smugglers. Barzan Majeed had recently been seen there. Our initial enquiries did not go well. We asked the manager if he could tell us about the trade - the cafe went quiet. Soon after, a man passed our table and unzipped his jacket to show us he was carrying a gun. It was a reminder that we were dealing with dangerous people. Our next stop yielded more promising results. We were told that Majeed had recently deposited €200,000 (£172,000) at a money exchange a few streets away. We left our number there, and in the middle of the following night, Rob's phone rang. The caller ID said “Number withheld” - on the end of the line was someone claiming to be Barzan Majeed. It was so late, and so unexpected, there was no time to record the beginning of the call. Rob recalled the voice on the line: “He goes, ‘I hear you’re looking for me.’ And I go, ‘Who are you? Scorpion?’ He goes, ‘Ha, you want to call me that? That’s fine.’” There was no way of telling whether this was the real Barzan Majeed, but the details he gave tallied with what we knew. He said he had been living in Nottingham until 2015 when he was deported. But he denied being involved in the trafficking business. “This is not true!” he protested. “It’s just the media.” The line kept cutting out, and despite our gentle probing, he gave no clue as to his location. We had no idea when, or if, he would call again. Meanwhile, a local contact of Rob told us that Scorpion was now involved in smuggling migrants from Turkey to Greece and Italy. What we heard was disturbing. Up to 100 men, women and children were being crowded on to yachts that were licensed to carry about 12 people. The yachts would be often piloted by smugglers with no experience of sailing, and would take a dangerous route between clusters of small islands to avoid coastguard patrols. There was big money to be made. Passengers were said to be paying about €10,000 each for a place on one of these boats. Over the past 10 years, more than 720,000 people are thought to have attempted to cross the eastern Mediterranean into Europe - of those, nearly 2,500 died, most by drowning. Julia Schafermeyer, from the charity SOS Mediterranean, says the traffickers put people's lives in great danger: “I don't think it makes any difference to them whether these people live or die.” About this time, we had the chance to put this question to Scorpion directly. Out of the blue, he called us again. Once again, he denied being a smuggler. However, his definition of the word seemed to be someone who physically carried out the task, rather than someone pulling the strings. “You have to be there,” he told us, adding: “Even now, I’m not there.” He was just the “money man”, he said. Majeed also seemed to show little sympathy for drowned migrants. “God [writes it down] when you’re going to pass away, but this is sometimes your fault,” he said. “God doesn’t never say ‘Go inside the boat’.” Our next stop was the resort of Marmaris, where Turkish police said they believed Scorpion owned a villa. We asked around and received a call from someone who said they had been friendly with him. She knew Majeed was involved in people-smuggling, and said that although this caused him stress, his worry was about the money, not the fate of the migrants. “He didn’t care about them - that's really sad, isn’t it?” she said. “It’s something I think back on and feel some shame because I... heard things and I knew they weren’t good.” She added that she had not seen him at his villa in Marmaris recently, although someone had told her he could be in Iraq. This was borne out by another contact, who said they had actually seen Scorpion at a money exchange in Sulaymaniyah, a city in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. We set off. If we could not find Scorpion there, we decided we would have to give up. But Rob’s contact managed to get in touch with him. At first, he was very suspicious, worried we somehow planned to snatch him and take him back to Europe. A flurry of text messages followed, first through Rob’s contact and then with Rob himself. Scorpion said he might meet us, but only if he was allowed to choose the venue. We ruled that out, worried he might be setting us up. And then a text message arrived, asking simply: “Where are you?” We said we were on our way to a nearby mall. Scorpion told us to meet him there in a coffee shop on the ground floor. Finally, we saw him.   Barzan Majeed looked like an affluent golfer. He was smartly dressed, in new jeans, a light-blue shirt and a black gilet. When he put his hands on the table, I saw his fingernails were manicured. Meanwhile, three men took a seat at a nearby table. His security team, we guessed. Once more, he denied being a big player at the top of a criminal organisation. He said other gang members had tried to implicate him. “A couple of people, when they get arrested, they say, ‘We’re working for him’. They want to get less sentence.” He also seemed bitter that other smugglers had been given British passports and carried on their trade. “In three days, one guy sent 170 or 180 people from Turkey to Italy, still holding a British passport!” he says. “I want to go to some other country to do business. I can’t.” When we pressed him about his responsibility for migrant deaths, he repeated what he had said on the phone - that he just took the money and booked places. For him, a smuggler was someone who loaded the people onto boats and lorries and transported them: “I never put anybody in a boat and I never kill anybody.” The conversation ended, but Scorpion invited Rob to see the money exchange he worked from in Sulaymaniyah. It was a small office - there was some writing in Arabic on the window and a couple of mobile phone numbers. People came here to pay for passage. Rob said that while he was there he saw a man carrying a box full of cash. On this occasion, Scorpion talked about how he got into the business in 2016, when many thousands of people were heading into Europe. “Nobody forced them. They wanted to,” he said. “They were begging the smugglers, ‘Please, please do this for us.’ Sometimes the smugglers say, ‘Just because of the sake of God, I will help them’. And then they complain, they say, ‘Oh this, that...’ No, this is not true.” Between 2016 and 2019, Scorpion said he had been one of two main people heading operations in Belgium and France, and admitted he had handled millions of dollars at that time. “I done them kind of things. Money, location, passengers, smugglers... I was between all of them.” He denied that he was still involved in people-smuggling, but his actions seemed to contradict this. Scorpion did not realise it, but as he scrolled through his mobile phone, Rob caught a reflection of the screen in a polished picture frame on the wall behind. What Rob could see was lists of passport numbers. We later learned that smugglers would send these to Iraqi officials. They would then be bribed to issue false visas so migrants could travel to Turkey. That was the last we saw of Scorpion. At every stage, we shared our discoveries with the authorities in the UK and Europe. Ann Lukowiak, a public prosecutor in Belgium who was involved in convicting Scorpion, still hopes that one day he will be extradited from Iraq. “It’s important to us to have sent the signal that you can't do what you want,” she says. “We will eventually take him down.”  

Read more

Türkiye’s Strikes Wreak Havoc on Northeast Syria

Critical Infrastructure Damaged, Millions Without Access to Essential Services Hiba Zayadin As the world's attention remains fixed on the devastating conflict unfolding in Gaza, another crisis is intensifying under the radar in northeast Syria. There, Türkiye’s airstrikes and drone attacks on critical civilian infrastructure are putting livelihoods at risk and severing communities from electricity, medical care, and other essential services. In late October 2023, Human Rights Watch reported that Turkish strikes on Kurdish-held areas of northeast Syria had resulted in water and electricity disruptions for millions of people. Back then, Turkish forces struck water and electrical power stations, oil installations, and the only operational gas plant for domestic use in all of northeast Syria. In December and January, Türkiye intensified its strikes to include medical facilities and crucial access roads used by humanitarian responders, according to the Northeast Syria (NES) NGO Forum, a coalition of international organizations operating in the area. Attacks which cause disproportionate damage to civilians and civilian objects are prohibited under international humanitarian law, and deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure is a war crime. The repeated strikes on civilian infrastructure have left many essential facilities in ruins, rendering hospitals, bakeries, and water facilities inoperable. Fuel, needed for cooking, heating, and farming, is running out. On January 29, the NES NGO forum said that 1 million people in cities and villages had been cut off from electricity, and over 2 million people had limited access to safe water. Damage to medical facilities targeted in December has disrupted the oxygen supply to more than a dozen private and public hospitals, and strikes on 28 health facilities have disrupted their services, increasing the risk of water-borne diseases. The forum warned that the “scale of damage far supersedes the humanitarian community’s capacity to sustain emergency life-saving service provision.” Türkiye has, for years, carried out military operations and airstrikes in northern Syria with the stated aim of targeting the Syrian Kurdish armed group, the People’s Protections Unit (YPG). Türkiye views the YPG as an extension of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), an armed group based in Türkiye and Iraq, which it considers a terrorist organization. As the crisis in Northeast Syria escalates, action is needed to mitigate the humanitarian impacts on the civilian population. Türkiye should immediately stop targeting critical civilian infrastructure, respect international humanitarian law and hold to account those responsible for serious violations. All countries need to address the plight of the region's populace even if other conflicts are dominating the headlines.

Read more

2023 prison census: Jailed journalist numbers near record high

Israel emerged as one of the world’s leading jailers of journalists following the October 7 start of the Israel-Gaza war, the Committee to Protect Journalists’ 2023 prison census has found. Israel ranked sixth – tied with Iran – behind China, Myanmar, Belarus, Russia, and Vietnam, respectively. Middle East and North Africa Egypt, routinely among the world’s worst jailers, tied with Turkey for the eighth-highest number of jailed journalists globally – 13 – in the 2023 census. Saudi Arabia was ninth, with 10 journalists behind bars. Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, and Iraqi Kurdistan have all expanded the use of false news, terrorism, and anti-state charges against journalists in recent years. Egyptian authorities regularly work around legislation limiting prisoners’ pretrial detention to two years by filing additional charges to extend that period. Cases in point: freelancer Mohamed Said Fahmy, has spent more than four and a half years in pretrial detention after being arrested on false news and terrorism charges in 2018. He was scheduled for release in 2020 and 2021, but his detention was extended after prosecutors added further charges. Mostafa Mohamed Saad, a senior cameraman for Qatari broadcasting network Al-Jazeera, has been held in pretrial detention in Cairo on terrorism and false news charges since 2019.  No new jailings were reported from Bahrain and Syria, which still held five journalists each in 2023, or from Morocco and Algeria, which each held three. Iraq’s four jailed journalists included one new prisoner in Iraqi Kurdistan. In Tunisia, Khalifa Guesmi was taken into custody in September to serve a five-year prison sentence on charges of disclosing national security information. Earlier in the year, an appeals court had increased his sentence from one to five years... Continue.  

Read more

Turkey says tanker seized by Iran carrying Turkish oil purchased from Iraq

Turkey’s main oil refiner Tupras said Thursday that a ship seized by Iran off the coast of Oman is laden with Turkish crude imported from Iraq.  Iran’s navy seized the Marshall Islands-flagged tanker St Nikolas, Iranian state media reported earlier Thursday. The move, according to the Iranian navy, came in retaliation for the confiscation of the same ship’s cargo by the United States in 2023. Under the name of Suez Rajan, the ship was laden with sanctioned Iranian oil and was bound for China before its owners were convinced by US officials to redirect to the United States.   Tupras said in a statement that radio communication with the Greek-owned and Tupras-chartered vessel was cut off at around 6:30 a.m. Istanbul time Thursday off the coast of Oman.  The tanker is carrying 140 metric tons of crude oil Tupras purchased from Iraqi state oil marketer SOMO and was en route to Turkey’s western port of Aliaga from Basra in Iraq, the statement added.  The ship’s Athens-based operator, Empire Navigation, told Reuters that the vessel’s 19-member crew consisted of 18 Filipino nationals and one Greek citizen.  Thursday's raid came after the US Navy reduced its presence in the Gulf region and diverted part of its Navy forces to the eastern Mediterranean as part of efforts to prevent the Israel-Hamas war from spreading to the broader region. Tensions between Washington and Tehran further escalated last week after the assassination of senior Hamas official Saleh al-Arouri in a Beirut neighborhood, which is under the influence of Iran-allied Hezbollah. Dozens of commercial shipping tankers in the region have been seized or harassed by Iran’s navy over the past few years. As Iranian attempts to seize commercial vessels increased following the confiscation of the Suez Rajan’s cargo, the United States beefed up allied patrols in Strait of Hormuz, increasing its military buildup in the region. Last year, the Biden administration also weighed a plan to deploy US Marines on commercial tankers but the plan was never approved.  

Read more

Iran's Proxies In Iraq Target Israel’s Eilat, Jordan Intercepts

Iran-backed Iraqi militias launched a drone attack on the Israeli port city of Eilat, but the drone was intercepted by Jordan in its airspace. The Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an umbrella term for multiple Iran’s proxies, claimed responsibility on X for the failed attack on Friday morning. In the statement, they claimed the drone had hit the target. According to Hebrew-language daily newspaper Maariv, the Jordanian Defense Ministry announced that it had shot down the drone after it had crossed into Jordanian airspace Islamic Resistance in Iraq said the attack is in support of the people of Gaza, who have been under heavy Israeli fire since October 7, when Tehran-backed Islamist militant group Hamas declared war on Israel, killing 1,200 mostly civilians and taking 240 hostages. According to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, the Islamic Resistance in Iraq (IRI) is not a fixed group "but rather a generic name used to denote unity among Iran-backed armed groups. The "generic, no-logo brand" militia is part of Iran's "facade strategy" to avoid accountability for attacks on Americans, which have been intensified by the Gaza crisis. The institute suggests that Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is likely coordinating the attacks and "corralling" Iran's proxies which would normally argue over public leadership. The attack on Eilat is part of Iran's attempts to use proxy groups around the Middle East to put pressure on the US and Israel, as has been the case with increased Houthi attacks in the Red Sea. Israel's Eilat Port has seen an 85% drop in activity since Iran-backed Houthi militants in Yemen stepped up attacks on shipping in the Red Sea, the port's chief executive said on Thursday. Also on Thursday, the US Central Command (CENTCOM) announced that Assad Air Base in Iraq’s western province of Anbar, hosting American forces, was targeted by Iran-backed proxy forces in Iraq, who have launched around 100 such attacks since October 7.

Read more

118 arbitrary detentions by Iranian government in November

Hengaw Organization According to data registered at the Statistics and Documentation Center of the Hengaw Organization, in November 2023, Iranian government security forces detained a minimum of 118 individuals. This reflects a 61% reduction when contrasted with the 303 individuals detained in the preceding month of October. The report reveals that in November 2023, the security forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran arbitrarily detained and forcibly disappeared a total of 44 Kurdish individuals, 7 Baloch people, 40 women, 5 children, and 18 Baha'i adherents.   More than 43% of those detainees are Kurdish or Baloch According to Hengaw's statistics, during November, at least 44 Kurdish individuals were detained by Iranian government entities, comprising 37% of the total detentions across Iran during the past month. During the same period, 7 Baloch individuals were also detained by government security forces, accounting for 6% of all detentions. Furthermore, during the past month, 9 Gilak activists, 5 Lor and Bakhtiari individuals, and 5 Turkish individuals were detained by security forces.   Detained Religious Minority Activists; The arbitrary detention of religious minority activists persisted in November, mirroring previous months, with government entities detaining a minimum of 26 individuals. Among those arrested, 18 were Baha'i adherents, comprising 12 women and 6 men. Furthermore, during the same period, Iranian government entities detained four Kurdish Yarsan adherents in Kermanshah province and four Sunni figures from Kurdistan and Sistan-Baluchistan.   Detention of 40 females and 5 minors in November; According to the statistics at the Hengaw Organization for Human Rights, at least 40 females were detained across Iran during the past month. This number accounts for 34% of all detentions. In the last month, at least 12 female Baha'i adherents, 7 Gilak women activists, and 2 Kurdish women activists were arrested. Additionally, during the same period, five minors under the age of 18 were detained or forcibly disappeared by security and government entities across Iran. These five detainee children are Kurdish from Piranshahr.   Detention of teachers, students, and media activists; During November 2023, based on Hengaw's statistics, at least 2 students in the cities of Tabriz and Karaj, as well as 9 teachers in the cities of Abdanan, Firuz Abad, Shiraz, Ahvaz, and Mashahd, were detained. It is also important to note that during the past month, at least six journalists and media activists, as well as nine artists and actors in various cities across Iran, were detained by government entities.

Read more

As Turkey intensifies war on Kurdish militants in Iraq, civilians are suffering

Seventeen-year-old Samir Saado was finishing his cleaning shift at the village medical centre when an airstrike hit the building. "I didn't see anything other than dust and smoke," said Saado, a member of Iraq’s minority Yazidi community. "My leg was stuck under the rubble. I called for help and people were coming but the planes kept striking.” At least four civilians were killed that day, Aug. 17, 2021, local officials said. Among the dead was Saado’s father, who worked as a cook at the centre in Iraq’s northern Sinjar province, about 100 km (62 miles) from the Turkish border. Saado suffered a broken pelvis and a cracked skull. The strike was part of escalating attacks by Turkish aircraft and drones in mainly Kurdish areas of Iraq and Syria, which have since continued, a Reuters data analysis shows. Western firms have supplied critical components for the drones, which Kurdish and Iraqi officials say Turkey is deploying with increasing frequency. Airstrikes have surged since Turkey launched “Operation Claw-Lock” in April last year. The aim, the Turkish Defence Ministry says, is to protect Turkey’s borders and “neutralise terrorism and terrorists at source.” Earlier this month , Turkey unleashed air strikes on militant targets in northern Iraq and Syria after the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) said it was behind a bomb attack near government buildings in Ankara, in which two police officers were injured. Northern Iraq is the base of the PKK, which over decades has carried out many deadly attacks in Turkey and is labelled a terrorist organisation by the United States and European Union. Turkish operations in Syria target the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG), a militia that Ankara says is a PKK-affiliated terrorist group. The YPG is part of the Syrian Democratic Forces, a U.S. ally against Islamic State. Turkey’s Defence Ministry said in a statement to Reuters that all of its operations fall “within the framework of international law, respecting the territorial integrity and sovereignty of all our neighbours.” “In the planning and execution of the operations, only terrorists and their positions, warehouses and shelters are targeted, and the utmost care and sensitivity is shown to prevent harm to civilians and to prevent damage to infrastructure and cultural sites.” Any claims to the contrary “are unfounded, slanderous, and lies,” the statement said. Reuters could not reach the PKK. The Syrian Democratic Forces said Turkish strikes in Syria are unjustified. A YPG spokesperson said its forces “did not fire a single shot in the direction of the Turkish state.” Reuters analysed violent incidents recorded by the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), a global research organisation that collects reports from media outlets, government reports, non-governmental groups and other sources. This analysis shows that in 2022, Turkey carried out at least 2,044 airstrikes in mostly Kurdish areas of Iraq and Syria, a 53% increase on the previous year and the highest number since ACLED began documenting strikes across the two countries in 2017. The figure is likely a conservative estimate because Reuters’ analysis excluded airstrikes that may have been conducted in battle. ACLED draws information about airstrikes in northern Iraq and Syria from sources including the PKK’s military wing, the Turkish state-owned news agency Anadolu and conflict monitors the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, Airwars and Liveuamap....continue reading.

Read more

What Did Nasrallah Really Say, and Why?

Hanin Ghaddar The Washington Institute The Hezbollah leader’s first public remarks on Gaza were cautious in tone and vague on substance, but the group may not stay deterred indefinitely if its political or tactical situation changes. As expected, Hezbollah secretary-general leader Hassan Nasrallah did not declare war against Israel today—rather, his first public speech on the Gaza conflict served as a reminder that his calculations on the crisis are the same as Iran’s, and that preserving Tehran’s plausible deniability for the actions of its proxies is paramount. (For English excerpts and analysis of the speech, see this live update thread by L’Orient Today.) In addition to assuring the international community that Iran is not responsible for any of Hamas’s actions, he also told Hamas that it is on its own: “This is a purely Palestinian battle and is not related to any regional or international file.” In other words, the “united front” is not that united. Rather than joining the actual fight, Nasrallah asked his supporters to fight the war of public opinion, essentially arguing that the battlefield is online, not in Gaza. The speech’s understated tone was more surprising—Nasrallah showed far less anger and agitation compared to his past speeches on conflicts in Syria and Yemen. After one month of eerie silence and three pre-speech trailers full of suspense, most observers anticipated a little escalation, even if mostly rhetorical. Yet his tone was largely muted and his red lines were vague. Besides warning that any Lebanese civilian fatalities would force Hezbollah to kill Israeli civilians in return, he offered the standard ambiguous rhetoric about choosing “the right time and place” to retaliate for Israel’s actions in Gaza. His bottom line was clear: for now at least, Hezbollah will not participate in the war beyond the current border skirmishes. (For more on Hezbollah’s attacks so far, see The Washington Institute’s interactive tracking map.) His warnings to the United States were more specific and potentially escalatory—he noted that Yemen’s Houthis will continue firing missiles northward, and that Iraqi militias will keep targeting the U.S. presence in both their country and Syria. Yet he was careful not to implicate Tehran in these Iranian proxy actions, nor did he threaten to use Hezbollah’s own weapons against U.S. forces. Indeed, Washington’s timely military deployments so close to Lebanon have seemingly played a major deterrent role for the group. Nasrallah’s speech was no doubt deeply disappointing for his supporters in Lebanon and the wider region, many of whom expected a more aggressive response by the alleged leader of the “resistance.” It was also disappointing for Hamas, which will probably feel less secure and more isolated now—and perhaps more inclined to negotiate and compromise. Yet the speech’s most serious repercussions will be felt in the realm of Hezbollah’s legitimacy. Nasrallah essentially declared that he will not be involved in the battle to “free Palestine,” a goal that lies at the core of his resistance narrative. In doing so, he confirmed that Hezbollah’s mission has drastically shifted since the 2006 war—from “resisting” Israel to protecting its own (and, by extension, Iran’s) interests in the region. Without the legitimizing power of resistance rhetoric, the group’s regional (and, perhaps, domestic) support base may lose faith in both Hezbollah and Tehran. Indeed, this predicament has bedeviled Hezbollah since 2006. Despite engaging in a month’s worth of calculated attacks along the border, the group’s military strength is becoming a weakness of sorts, since flexing its muscles more than it already has would increase the risk of a major Israeli response. Hezbollah has long used the threat of its increasingly advanced arsenal as a deterrent against Israel. But Nasrallah also knows that these same weapons—particularly its precision-guided missiles—would lose their main value if the group began launching them, since Hezbollah forces and assets would quickly be exposed to a devastating war. Yet by dashing regional expectations for a grand, effective, and united military response against Israel, Nasrallah may incur other costs. In short, the group is damned if it escalates and damned if it doesn’t. Nasrallah also briefly addressed what might happen when the Gaza war is over and Israel turns its full attention back to Lebanon and Hezbollah’s dangerous missiles. The deterrence strategy that was upheld for seventeen years is likely no longer valid now that Israel suffered such horrific casualties at the hands of another neighboring enemy on October 7. Even before the Gaza war, Hezbollah’s border escalation was seemingly changing Israel’s calculus; today, many countries have concluded that groups like Hamas and Hezbollah need to be contained before another October 7 happens. In addition, the United States has reestablished a very strong military presence in the region, and even if some of these deployments prove temporary, the Biden administration’s recent diplomatic activity in the Middle East indicates a longer-term determination to prevent escalation after the war. Nasrallah seems aware of these shifts and has signaled Hezbollah’s unwillingness to change the deterrence policy along the border: “The resistance’s operations in the South tell the enemy that if it carries out an aggression or thinks of waging a preemptive operation, it will be committing the biggest foolishness in its history.” While vague and couched as a warning against Israeli action, this remark essentially communicated that Hezbollah will not escalate unless Israel launches some kind of unexpected, large-scale campaign across the northern border. Despite Nasrallah’s rhetorical caution, however, the fact remains that more and more military clashes are occurring on Lebanon’s border daily, so the risks of miscalculation are rising as well. Whether he likes it or not, he may eventually find himself having to make a very different speech in the midst of unintended escalation with Israel. Alternatively, Hezbollah may one day improve its financial situation and boost its military apparatus to the point where it is truly ready to face Israel in a full-scale conflict. Either way, the United States and its partners must continue signaling Hezbollah and Iran that they are willing to strike back if the group miscalculates its current level of attacks or changes its tactics. They should also start formulating a new Iran policy—one that addresses all of Iran’s militias and destabilizing activities in the region. Otherwise, they risk leaving themselves vulnerable to a repeat of October 7 on another frontier.

Read more

Zhina Amini awarded top EU human rights prize

Mahsa Amini and the Woman, Life and Freedom Movement in Iran were on Thursday awarded the European Parliament's Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought. "The 16 September 2022 is a date that will live in infamy and the brutal murder of 22-year-old Jina Mahsa Amini marked a turning point. It has triggered a women-led movement that is making history," European Parliament President Roberta Metsola said after announcing the winner.  "The world has heard the chants of "women, life, liberty", three words that have become a rallying cry for all those standing up for equality, for dignity and for freedom in Iran.  "So let's today's prize serve as a tribute to the brave and defiant women, men and young people of Iran who despite coming under increasing pressure are leading the push for change. The European Parliament hears you, the world sees you and we are with you," she added.  The Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought, given each year since 1988 by the European Parliament, is the European Union's highest tribute to human rights defenders and comes with a €50,000 endowment.  Last year it was awarded to the "brave people" of Ukraine defending their country against Russia's relentless invasion. Women rights' defenders and Nicaraguan activists Two other nominees made it on the finalist shortlist. Women fighting for free, safe and legal abortion were nominated by the Left group which highlighted three women in particular including Justyna Wydrzyńska. The Polish activist is a member of the Abortion Dream Team, a grassroots initiative that provides direct and immediate assistance to women who need abortions. She was sentenced to eight months community service for helping a woman obtain an abortion in Poland, whose government rolled out a near-total ban on pregnancy terminations in 2021. The two other women included were Morena Herrera, a feminist and social activist, advocating for safe and legal abortion access in El Salvador, and Colleen McNicholas, an American obstetrician-gynaecologist with a strong track record of high-quality patient care and impactful reproductive health advocacy. The nomination of Vilma Núñez de Escorcia and Monsignor Rolando José Álvarez Lagos from Nicaragua was meanwhile backed by 43 MEPs. Nuñez is a lawyer and human rights activist who has chosen to remain in the country despite being jailed and tortured. Álvarez, Bishop of Matagalpa, is a vocal critic of President Daniel Ortega's Sandinista regime. He was sentenced to 26 years in prison earlier this year and his nationality was suspended after he was charged with treason, undermining national integrity and spreading false news.  The prize will be given at a ceremony in the European Parliament in Strasbourg on 13 December.  The Prize is named in honour of Soviet physicist and political dissident and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Andrei Sakharov.  

Read more

US sends radar system to its forces in Syria

The United States provided its forces in the Deir Ez-Zor province in eastern Syria with a radar system after oil fields in the area were attacked by “foreign terrorist groups backed by Iran,” local sources reported. The sources told the Anadolu Agency that US forces brought four radar systems from Iraq to their base in the Al-Shaddadah area, in Al-Hasakah province, northeastern Syria, through the Al-Walid border gate on Saturday. US forces deployed radar systems in Al-Omar oil and Konko gas fields in Deir Ez-Zor yesterday, according to the same sources. A radar-linked missile system was also deployed at the two sites, the model of which was not identified. The sources stated that the deployment of the radar system was to respond to any attacks by Iranian-backed terrorist groups west of the Euphrates River. On 17 July, Washington reinforced its forces in Syria with four Himars missile launchers, 15 artillery batteries, five armoured vehicles, five tanks, and 45 ammunition-loaded vehicles, which arrived at its base in Al-Shaddadah.

Read more

All Contents are reserved by Draw media.
Developed by Smarthand