Draw Media
هه‌واڵ / جیهان

Syrian Democratic Council calls for international action against Turkey’s strikes

The Syrian Democratic Council (SDC), a part of the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria, has released a statement on the anniversary of the "Peace Spring" operation, where the Turkish Armed Forces captured the cities of Serêkaniyê (Ras al-Ain) and Girê Spî (Tal Abyad) in northern Syria. In the statement, the SDC noted that four years after the operation, Turkey's attacks on North and East Syria continue. They called on the international coalition led by the United States, as well as Russia, to take action. According to Hawar News Agency (ANHA), the statement criticized Turkey's airstrikes and drone attacks on the region's infrastructure and energy centers. It emphasized that Turkey's ongoing attacks on the region have tragically affected the lives of more than five million people. The SDC called on Russia and the international coalition, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and France, to fulfill their responsibilities and urgently take steps to stop the attacks and protect the region. The Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria previously declared three days of mourning following an airstrike on the Internal Security Forces Academy in Derik, affiliated with the Haseke governorate, on October 8, which resulted in the loss of 29 lives and injuries to 28 others. At least 45 fatalities At least 45 people have lost their lives in the airstrikes that began after Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan's statement on October 4, indicating that infrastructure and superstructure in North and East Syria would be targeted, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights based in London. According to the Observatory's reports: - 30 Asayish members in the village of Gucerat in the rural area of Haseke - One person at a petrol station in El-Kahtaniye - Six members of the Internal Security Forces in Haseke city - Two individuals as a result of an attack on a moving vehicle in El-Müşerifa (Mişêrfa) in the north of Haseke - One civilian in the village of Tel Habeş (Til Hebeş) in Amude district - Five people in Kobanê; two workers in Celabiya, three soldiers in Sırrin lost their lives in the airstrikes.

Read more

Campaigners raise alarm after former Kurdish oil minister sues journalists

ARAB NEWS Campaigners have expressed concern that UK courts are being used to silence critical reporting after a former Kurdish minister sued two journalists who accused him of misconduct, The Times reported. Ashti Hawrami, who served as oil minister of the Kurdistan Regional Government from 2006 to 2019, is taking legal action against journalists Will Jordan and Daniel Balint-Kurti, reporters for the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, over a 2021 article that alleged he had misused his power to grant oil concessions. Hawrami, who was a major player in the Kurdish oil industry, was linked to UK MP and former chancellor Nadhim Zahawi, who worked as a “fixer” for oil company Gulf Keystone. Campaigners say Hawrami’s claim is a “strategic lawsuit against public participation,” or SLAPP, a legal strategy designed to intimidate journalists and discourage public interest reporting. The practice has received increasing scrutiny in the UK, with lawsuits often filed by wealthy or powerful individuals against journalists and activists, who face having their financial resources drained amid costly litigation fees. In a letter to the UK justice secretary last month, editors from several major newspapers, including The Times, The Telegraph and The Guardian, warned that SLAPPs represent a growing threat to press freedom in the UK and Europe. “We are deeply concerned that human rights defenders are facing prison sentences and heavy fines for exercising their right to freedom of expression and opinion,” UN experts said in a statement last year. It is unclear if the case against Jordan and Balint-Kurti will come to court. Hawrami’s lawyers said that they decided to sue OCCRP only after contacting the outlet to dispute the accuracy of several claims. A spokesman for Hawrami’s lawyers, Carter Ruck, said: “There is no proper basis whatsoever to assert that this case is a SLAPP. The position is that our client only very reluctantly brought proceedings in May 2022, over an article published in May 2021, when extensive attempts to resolve his complaint, without recourse to litigation, broke down. “As well as making false claims, the article contains significant errors which to this day have never been corrected. Our client finds himself in the very regrettable position of having been defamed and is entitled to bring legal proceedings seeking to clear his name.” The case is being closely watched by press freedom groups and journalists, who fear that it could set a dangerous precedent for press freedom in the UK.

Read more

Iraq-Turkey oil pipe restart not imminent

The restart of the Iraq-Turkey oil pipeline continues to be "complicated" by financial compensation issues between the two countries and is not imminent, a senior Iraqi source told Argus, as expectations are mounting over a possible return of around 470,000 b/d of northern Iraqi crude following a six-month shut-in. "The issue is not about logistics, but financial commitments," the source said. Talks about how and when to restart pipeline flows have been underway between Turkey and Iraq since late June. And the Turkish official line often attributes the halt in exports to inspection and assessment of the pipeline for earthquake-damage. Iraq's prime minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and oil minister Hayan Abdulghani also used this justification. But the problem lies with financial compensation, according to the senior Iraqi source. "Turkey cannot pay Iraq the compensation it is required under the arbitration case ruling. The situation is complicated," he said. The Paris-based International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in March ordered Ankara to pay Baghdad $1.9bn for breaching its contract with Iraq by directly trading oil with the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) between 2014 and 2018. It awarded Turkey around $500mn for counterclaims, mainly predicated on low pipeline capacity and unpaid transportation fees dating back to the 1990s. Turkey is also seeking legal action against Iraq, and has filed at the ICC a motion to set aside the arbitration ruling. Another financial layer hinders the restart of 470,000 b/d flows — around 400,000 b/d sold by the KRG and 70,000 b/d of federal Iraqi crude — from Turkey's Ceyhan port, according to the source. "The Turks have loaned the Kurds a certain sum of money. It seems like payback used to happen through Turkey getting a certain share from Kurdish crude exports through the Iraq-Turkey pipeline," the source said. And Turkey wants the money, he said. Turkey's energy minister Alparslan Bayraktar earlier this month said that the pipeline is "more or less ready", but that its restart was down to Erbil and Baghdad. "They need to get together and decide how they're going to proceed," he said. Relations between Erbil and Baghdad have been strained over the past few months, with both sides accusing each other of not upholding their end of the 2023 budget agreement. But Iraq's federal government this month approved an increase in loans to the cash-strapped Kurdistan Region Government (KRG), which could temporarily turn down the heat between the two. And the KRG's finance ministry on 24 September announced that it will begin dispersing public servants' salaries, in a sign that Baghdad began transferring money. Erbil will initially receive 2.1 trillion Iraqi dinars ($1.6bn) for the current fiscal year, to be paid in three ID700bn instalments starting this month.

Read more

Oil exports from northern Iraq to be resumed soon

The Turkish Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, Alparslan Bayraktar, said that the inspection of the oil pipeline between Iraq and Turkey has been completed, and the pipeline will be technically ready for operation soon. Turkey had stopped oil flows through the pipeline in northern Iraq on March 25, after the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) ordered Ankara to pay Baghdad $1.5 billion in compensation for damages caused by the Kurdistan Regional Government’s (KRG) export of oil without permission from the federal government in Baghdad between 2014 and 2018. Turkey began maintenance work on the pipeline, which, according to Turkish officials, passes through a seismically active area and was damaged by floods. “As of today, an independent survey company has completed its work, and they are now preparing the report,” Bayraktar said in a press briefing last Thursday. The Turkish minister did not mention a date for the resumption of oil flows through the pipeline. The Association of the Petroleum Industry of Kurdistan (APIKUR) said at the end of August that the closure of the Iraqi oil export pipeline to the Turkish port of Ceyhan has cost producers and the Iraqi government about $4 billion. According to the APIKUR, which includes a group of foreign and local companies working in oil production, losses are expected to continue despite initial talks between the Iraqi and Turkish governments to resolve the outstanding issue.

Read more

Iran’s Pressure Campaign on Iranian Kurds Continues

The Washington Institute, Wladimir van Wilgenburg Iran has stepped up pressure on Baghdad and Erbil to disarm and relocate Iranian Kurdish opposition parties in the Kurdistan Region amidst ongoing disputes between Erbil and Baghdad over budget and oil revenues. Most of the Iranian Kurdish parties are located in areas controlled by the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), apart from fighters of the Kurdistan Free Life Party (PJAK), that are in Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) controlled territories in the Qandil mountains, who vowed not to disarm. The situation has become even more precarious for Iranian Kurdish parties, especially with the appointment of Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani's government in October 2022. Sudani’s government received support from the Iran-backed Coordination Framework and is perceived as granting Iran greater room to exert its influence. Tehran is hoping to remove the Iranian Kurdish parties from Iraq, as it did with the People's Mujahideen Organization of Iran that was moved from Baghdad to Albania in 2016. While it has proven more difficult to convince the KRG to comply compared to Shia parties in Baghdad, Iran is applying significant pressure on officials in Erbil and Suleimani. Furthermore, the position of the Kurdistan Region significantly weakened in March after Baghdad won the international arbitration case in Paris against Turkey, which stopped the export of 500,000 barrels per day through Turkey. The abrupt removal of its key form of revenue generation made Kurdistan more dependent on the budget coming out of Baghdad. The Iraqi government could also use this as a pretext to gain more control over the Kurdistan Region’s border areas and weaken the Kurdistan Region’s autonomy. Baghdad is already demanding oil and non-oil revenues in addition to the handover of 400,000 bpd from the KRG in exchange for sending the budget to Erbil. Therefore, the KRG is under more pressure to make concessions. This contentious relationship between Baghdad and Erbil is not a new development, however. Even before PM Sudani’s administration, Iran has carried out several ballistic missile and drone attacks on Iranian Kurdish forces in the Kurdistan Region since 2018. The PDKI in 2016 briefly broke a ceasefire with Iran and resumed attacks, but these hostilities ceased soon after. The KRG previously instructed the Iranian Kurdish parties to not use the Kurdistan Region’s territory as a staging ground for attacks on Iran, and for the most part they have abided by this request.   Targeting Iranian Kurdish Parties During Iranian Protests The Iranian attacks and pressure on Iranian Kurdish parties intensified after massive protests erupted in Iran, following the death of Jina (Mahsa) Amini, a young Kurdish woman on September 16 of last year while in the custody of Iran's morality police. While the resulting protests were pervasive and spanned across Iran’s ethnic communities, Iran has attempted to blame sectarianism and accused the Kurdish Iranian opposition parties of fomenting unrest in Iranian Kurdistan. Tehran claims that these Kurdish parties have worked with Israel to attack Iran. Between September and October 2022, Iran carried out several attacks using ballistic missiles and suicide drones on three Iranian Kurdish opposition parties, including the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan (PDKI) in Koya and the Sidekan subdistrict (Erbil governorate), Komala in Zirgwez (Sulaimani governorate) and the Kurdistan Freedom Party (PAK) in Pirde (road between Erbil-Kirkuk). According to Hengaw, at least 21 members of these parties died, including two women, a one-day-old child, and also a civilian from Koya. Moreover, Iran threatened a military incursion that October, although the threat did not materialize. In order to assuage Iran’s concerns, Iraq deployed border guards to the border with Iran in December 2022, and in March signed a border security agreement with Iran. While the attacks decreased after the Iranian protests largely died down by January this year after a huge crackdown—with at least 537 killed—Iran has continued to carry out assassinations against Iranian Kurdish opposition figures in the Kurdistan Region, including one in July against two PDKI members. In addition, Iran and Iranian affiliated Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) have previously targeted Kurdistan’s oil and gas infrastructure and the U.S. military presence. Turkish military bases in Iraq have also been targeted by PMU groups. On August 30, rockets allegedly fired from Tuz Khurmato once again targeted the Khor Mor gas field. PMF groups are now also in close proximity to the Kurdistan Region, having benefited from the anti-ISIS war in 2014 and gaining control of disputed territories from the Peshmerga forces in October 2017, subsequent to the September 2017 referendum. Iran also played a major role in the events of October. Consequently, Kurdish provinces are within the range of PMF’s katyusha rockets. Renewed Threats and a Hard Deadline Iran has been increasing the pressure in the weeks leading up to the anniversary of Jina Amini’s death. Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs Nasser Kanaani on August 28 underlined that Iran’s deadline issued earlier this year to disarm Iranian Kurdish parties by September 19 “will not be extended” under any circumstances. He underlined that Iran expects Baghdad to evacuate and transfer the Iranian Kurdish parties from their military bases to camps designated by the Iraqi government. Kanaani warned that if the Iraqi government does not fulfill its commitment by the end of the set deadline, Iran will act in line “with its responsibility to guarantee its own security.” Moreover, Iran has reportedly also submitted a list of Iranian Kurdish leaders to Baghdad, seeking their extradition. Most recently, Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi called Iraqi Prime Minister Sudani directly, emphasizing that any efforts from “separatist terrorist groups” to undermine regional security would not be tolerated. PAK spokesperson Khalil Nadri also added that there will be more attacks on Iranian Kurdish parties “if the US and its allies remain silent about Iran's threats.” stating that “Washington can stop Iran from taking a decisive stance" but that its current indifference was sending the wrong signals to Iran. It seems likely that Iran will continue its drone and missile strikes so long as the KRG does not disarm or relocate Iranian Kurdish groups, especially amidst the upcoming anniversary. In addition to artillery and drone attacks, Iran could also attempt to launch cross-border assaults, similar to Turkey’s offensive into KRG territory in the north. In 1996, Iran launched a cross-border offensive with 3,000 troops against the PDKI in Koya, killing at least 20 members. Following the offensive, the PDKI announced they would stop cross-border attacks. Moreover, it will be difficult for the KRG to fully disarm the groups, although it could try to remove Iranian Kurdish armed fighters from positions at the border with Iran. Indeed, reports over the last several days suggest that this process may be beginning, although the scope of these efforts is not yet clear. These include reports that PAK forces were removed from Pirde, located between Erbil and Kirkuk. Reportedly, Iraq has stationed an additional 6,000 troops along its borders and plans to construct new border posts, with aims to recruit 3,000 locals for border guards. Iraqi National Security Advisor Qassem al-Araji had meetings with both senior KRG and PUK officials in Iran and the Kurdistan Region to discuss the border agreement. This dialogue continues; on September 11, KRG interior minister Reber Ahmad arrived in Baghdad to discuss the situation, while PUK head Bafel Talabani travelled to Iran the preceding day for meetings likely linked to the crisis. On August 20, Araji also met with the UN envoy to Iraq, and KRG’s Interior Minister to discuss the situation of refugees in the Kurdistan Region. Also on September 11, PM Masrour Barzani met with Iran’s Ambassador. Kurdish President Nechirvan Barzani on Wednesday also said that both Baghdad and Erbil have taken steps, which leaves no more “room for any pretext for an Iranian military operation.” Iraqi FM Fuad Hussein also told reporters on September 13 during a visit to Iran that the groups will be disarmed in two days. However, Kamran Matin, a senior Lecturer in International Relations at University of Sussex thinks it is unlikely that the Kurdistan Region will disarm Iranian Kurdish groups. “These groups have a long and close relationship with [the] local population so any move by KRG to disarm them will be politically costly for its ruling parties.” He added that the “US might also not condone such a move which will boost Iran’s influence in Iraq and the wider region.” However, he said a “change in the existing pattern of these groups’ presence in KRI is possible, especially one involving UN oversight.” For their part, Iranian Kurdish opposition groups are not staying silent. In a rare move among a series of parties that do not generally coordinate their movements, on September 6, most of the Iranian Kurdish parties called for a general strike on September 16—the anniversary of Amini’s death. “On the other hand, Rojhalat of Kurdistan (Iranian Kurdistan) is on the eve of the anniversary of the Jina (Mahsa Amini) Uprising. Iran wants to draw attention to the street threats of Iranian political parties,” PAK spokesperson Khalil Nadri stated in an interview with the author. He also accused Tehran of leading “a comprehensive process against all parts of Kurdistan. This is a process that began in 2017” in response to the Kurdish independence referendum. In August, the KRG reportedly summoned officials from Komala and PDKI parties to discuss mounting pressures from Tehran, reported The Citadel. The opposition groups were open to move to new camps, but they rejected calls to surrender their arms. The PDKI has since called on both Baghdad and the international community to prevent new attacks. When asked about the potential of relocating forces from near the Iranian border, a member of PDKI, on the condition of anonymity, said, “I don’t think that is an option for us. We might relocate but not move from the border.” Other officials echo the same sentiment. Arash Saleh, representative of PDKI to the United States, also told the author that “PDKI has never used Iraq’s soil to initiate any military activities against Iran. We respect the sovereignty of Iraq.” Reflecting on the broader geopolitical impact of these maneuvers, Saleh proposed that “Iran's end game here is ultimately to tighten its grip on Iraq. The regime in Tehran is trying to increase its influence and leverage in Iraq and to undermine KRG status and they use any baseless pretext to further their agenda. The silence in Washington, London, and Paris about this matter can be disastrous for the West's interests in Iraq and the broader region.”

Read more

Can oil and water mix?: Creating opportunities for Iraq-Turkey cooperation

Middle East Institute Last week saw a flurry of diplomatic activity between Baghdad and Ankara. The top priorities in the talks that took place in Erbil, Ankara, and Baghdad almost simultaneously were oil exports, the presence of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) in Iraq, and Iraq’s water crisis. The visits by Ankara’s foreign and energy ministers to Iraq and by Baghdad’s oil minister to Turkey were preparations for an anticipated visit by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to Iraq, which Iraqi sources think could happen in September, to agree on a way forward on these thorny issues. The outcomes have been unimpressive, with public statements offering no new ideas and little more than reiterations of long-established positions, demands, and expressions of hope. But there is an opportunity for Iraq to shake things up and improve its bargaining position, at least on the oil export issue, possibly more. What’s at stake for Iraq and Turkey? First, Baghdad and Erbil seek the resumption of oil exports from Kirkuk and the Kurdistan region through the Iraq-Turkey Pipeline (ITP). These have been halted since March, when Iraq won an arbitration case at the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) against Turkey for allowing unilateral exports from the Kurdistan region without Baghdad’s approval. The loss of 450,000 barrels per day (bpd) of exports for five months has cost Baghdad and Erbil some $5 billion in unrealized gross revenue. The monetization of this oil is necessary to implementing Iraq’s $150 billion 2023 budget and keeping the daunting $48 billion deficit in check. Turkey’s direct losses are smaller, to the tune of $2 million-3 million a day in oil transit fees, setting aside the lost opportunity of a revitalized oil and gas trade with Iraq. Second for Iraq is water. The country is experiencing yet another dry year that has seen lakes and marshes disappear as the volume of water flowing down the Tigris and Euphrates from upstream neighbors Turkey and Iran dwindled, forcing Iraq to take desperate measures, such as installing new pumps to extract water from dead space in reservoirs along both rivers. The situation is particularly dire with tributaries originating in Iran, like the Little Zab, whose water has been blocked by Iran for weeks, and with the Euphrates, which Iraqi water officials say currently runs dry before it can meet the Tigris at their iconic confluence near Basra. In July, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in Iraq reported the Euphrates measured a mere 56 cm deep in Nasiriyah, causing 90% of the nearby marshes to go dry. The third issue is security, particularly the presence of the PKK on Iraqi territory stretching from Sulaymaniyah and Makhmour to the east, to the rugged Qandil Mountains in the north, and all the way to Sinjar near the Syrian border in the west. Turkey has conducted numerous airstrikes to weaken the PKK inside Iraq and insists that either Baghdad or Erbil must take action to end the PKK “virus” that’s spreading, in Ankara’s view, along hundreds of miles of its southern border. Iraq has its own problems with the PKK, whose presence, and that of its affiliates, has attracted heavy-handed Turkish military action and destabilizes the war-ravaged Sinjar in western Nineveh Province. Deadlock continues With regard to the PKK, Tukey’s Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan repeated the argument that the PKK presence must end, whether with Baghdad’s or Erbil’s cooperation. The problem is, neither has the power or political will to act decisively. Their ability to take action is complicated by the material and political cost and difficulty of a fight with an entrenched guerilla opponent, and by the fact that PKK affiliates, especially the Sinjar Resistance Units (YBS), have strong local support in Sinjar, where they are seen as legitimate defenders of the traumatized Yazidi minority community. And the ruling parties in Erbil don’t view the PKK with the same eye. While the Kurdistan Democratic Party in Erbil considers the PKK a foe, the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan in Sulaymaniyah has been sympathetic, if not supportive. There is also evidence of growing collaboration between the YBS and powerful Iran-backed factions in the Popular Mobilization Forces, who have supported attacks against Turkish forces in Iraq. Unsurprisingly, Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani could do no more than tell Ankara’s envoy that his government was ready to cooperate with Turkey to prevent attacks originating from its territory, in reference to actions by the PKK, but called on Turkey to avoid unilateral military action that’s been embarrassing both Baghdad and Erbil. Progress was dismal on water too. Sudani celebrated a new agreement to establish a joint committee on water. This arrangement is too little for the magnitude of the unfolding environmental, economic, and social crisis. Not only did Ankara stop short of making any commitments to releasing more water to save the communities that depend on the Euphrates — the International Organization for Migration says a third of the 85,000 Iraqis displaced by water scarcity lived in Dhi-Qar Province along the river — but in fact forming such a committee simply repackages an agreement made in 2021 during the Kadhimi administration. With regard to oil, where Ankara controls the literal switch, the latest talks did not produce an agreement. Turkish stalling could not be more transparent. Turkish officials said they needed more time to inspect the pipeline and storage tanks at the Mediterranean port of Ceyhan for damage from the Feb. 6 earthquake. This is hardly believable considering that the flow of oil continued for 46 days after the earthquake, and was halted on March 25 hours after the ICC made its ruling in Iraq’s favor. Surely that was no coincidence. Instead, Turkey is using the ITP as the bargaining chip it holds to extract concessions on oil and security cooperation from Erbil and Baghdad. An Iraqi oil official familiar with the talks told Reuters that it was “not an easy job to reach an agreement soon and we have a lot of thorny issues. Turkey has demands and conditions that require further talks.” Reports in Iraq say that in addition to reducing the amount in damages it must pay (set by ICC at $1.5 billion), Turkey has made other tough demands, including deep discounts on oil, dropping all claims against it, higher oil transit fees at $7 per barrel (as opposed to a maximum of $1.18 per the current pipeline treaty, as renewed in 2010), and renumeration for pipeline maintenance costs. Iraq’s unused leverage Rather ironically, Turkey’s decision to prolong the halting of Iraqi (both federal and Kurdistan Regional Government) oil exports has realigned Baghdad and Erbil’s interests so that, for the first time in a long time, Baghdad wants Erbil’s oil to reach international markets as much as Erbil does. With mutual interests at risk, and in light of the recent convergence in their positions on the management of oil resources, reflected in Erbil’s agreeing in April to allow Iraq’s state oil marketer (SOMO) to handle its oil exports, Erbil and Baghdad can turn the tables. With additional technical steps taken in line with the political agreement made in April, Baghdad and Erbil can be in a much stronger position on oil than they currently perceive themselves to be. The key is maximizing the utilization of oil produced in Kirkuk and the Kurdistan region in the downstream sector inside Iraq, namely refineries, and to a lesser extent power plants. A comprehensive strategy should look at crude oil as a fungible commodity, with barrels flowing to wherever they generate the most economic return. Such a strategy may include several tactics: First, action is needed to ensure that the maximum capacity of the Kalak, Bazian, Nineveh, and Dukan refineries in the Kurdistan region, which can process up to 230,000 bpd of oil, is utilized to absorb as much trapped production as possible to meet domestic demand nationwide, and potentially to export surplus refined products. Second is to use trucking to move oil produced in the Kurdistan region to refineries and/or power plants in central and southern Iraq. This can replace feedstock coming from the country’s southern fields and free up more of that oil for export. The cost of transportation, assuming for example 240-mile trips from Kirkuk to Iraq’s newly built 140,000 bpd Karbala refinery, will be significantly less than the $7 demanded by Turkey. For comparison, it costs Jordan $6.80 per barrel to transport Iraqi crude oil by tanker trucks for 600 miles from Kirkuk to its refinery at Zarqa. Third, officials in Baghdad and Erbil should consider planning ahead to ensure the right infrastructure is in place to allow an additional 150,000 bpd of oil produced in Kurdistan to flow towards the Baiji complex, where a refinery of that capacity is undergoing reconstruction with a target of becoming operational before the end of 2024. Some growing pains can be expected as Erbil and Baghdad try to further integrate their energy sectors but the two governments have the capacity to adapt to Ankara’s continued blocking of exports and the payoff can be worthwhile. Baghdad and Erbil can turn oil from an issue where they need Ankara’s cooperation into a bargaining chip of their own. Discounted oil can be offered to Turkey if the latter reciprocates with reasonable terms for the long-term usage of the pipeline, and shows more cooperation on addressing Iraq’s water crisis. There are gains for Turkey to make as well. Now that Erbil and Baghdad are much closer to being on the same page on export management, reduced uncertainty can help Iraq invest in ramping up production from Kirkuk to get more oil flowing through Turkey to make the ITP more profitable. Addressing Iraq’s urgent water needs creates more favorable conditions for involving Turkish companies in modernizing Iraq’s irrigation systems, to the benefit of both riparian states. Baghdad may also consider giving the green light to reviving prior schemes to sell Kurdistan’s gas to Turkey. The PKK issue may, for the foreseeable future, be an intractable one but that shouldn’t prevent the two neighbors from making progress elsewhere. Iraq and Turkey should see respective abundance in oil and water as an opportunity for integration and interdependence rather than conflict and exploitation.  

Read more

Turkey extends flight ban on Iraqi Kurds' Sulaimaniyah airport over alleged PKK support

Amberin Zaman, Al-monitor Turkey on Monday extended a flight ban to Iraqi Kurdistan’s Sulaimaniyah International Airport for six months, Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) officials confirmed, in a move that will further squeeze the region’s economy and physically isolate it from the West. The extension was first reported by the Iraqi Kurdish news outlet Rudaw, citing officials from Turkey’s national carrier, Turkish Airlines. The initial ban was announced in April and imposed for three months on the grounds that the airport had become a hub for activities of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK). The Turkish Kurdish group, whose top commanders are based in Iraqi Kurdistan, has been orchestrating its armed campaign against the Turkish military from the Iraq-Iran border since the early 1990s.   Sulaimaniyah is under the control of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), the second most influential party in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, which has traditionally enjoyed close ties with the PKK. Qubad Talabani, whose older brother Bafel runs the PUK, traveled to Ankara in April in a bid to appease Ankara, but apparently to little effect. The PUK is clearly not living up to Ankara’s expectations to restrict and provide actionable intelligence on the PKK’s activities in the Sulaimaniyah region. The Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), which leads the KRG, is, on the other hand, closely allied with Turkey and supports its ongoing military campaign against the PKK. Thousands of Turkish troops are deployed across KDP-held territory close to the Turkish border where the bulk of the rebels are based. Officials of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) are not permitted to use the Erbil airport to travel abroad in keeping with Ankara’s wishes. KRG Prime Minister Masrour Barzani, whose father, Massoud, leads the KDP, became the first foreign dignitary to pay Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan a formal visit following his election victory in May. Ankara insists that the Sulaimaniyah airport has been used to smuggle in weapons destined for the rebels, who used it to travel between Iraq and the outside world. The airport was also used by officials from the US-backed Kurdish administration in northeast Syria, notably Mazlum Kobane, commander in chief of the SDF. The Kurdish-led force is the United States’ main ally in the ongoing campaign to degrade and destroy the Islamic State in northeast Syria. Turkey says that the SDF is part of the broader PKK network and is demanding that the United States scotch its partnership with the group. In April, Turkey targeted Kobane and his convoy, which was also carrying US military officials, near the Sulaimaniyah airport in a drone strike just days after sealing its airspace to flights bound to and from there. Kobane had just returned from a trip to the United Arab Emirates to lobby for its support, as first reported by Al-Monitor. Kobane has kept a low profile ever since, and security measures in northeast Syria have been tightened dramatically. Yet Turkey continues to pick off SDF and PKK-linked individuals in drone strikes both in Iraq and Syria. PKK-led groups are under stronger pressure than ever before, said a Western analyst who spoke anonymously to Al-Monitor following a recent trip to northeast Syria. Bilal Wahab, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, views the continued ban as part of a broader trend whereby regional powers Turkey and Iran as well as the central government in Baghdad are engaging the PUK and KDP as individual actors rather than as representatives of a unified KRG — a trend that has been accelerated by the sharp divisions between the Iraqi Kurdish parties themselves. “The KRG as a unified governing entity is being undone. Part of it stems from the KDP-PUK divisions, which are inviting regional powers to deal with the PUK and the KDP separately,” Wahab told Al-Monitor. As such, the flight ban is a further example of Turkey having a KDP and a PUK policy, where one is punished and the other rewarded. “This also tracks with how Baghdad treats the KRG,” Wahab added. Despite its close ties to the KDP, Turkey has failed to allow the resumption of Iraqi and Kurdish oil sales through a pipeline network that runs from KDP controlled territory to export terminals on its Mediterranean coast. Turkey sealed the line on March 25 after an international arbitration court ordered Turkey to pay Baghdad $1.5 billion in damages for enabling the KRG to sell its oil independently of Baghdad. The closure is costing the KRG an estimated $1 billion in monthly revenues that is used to pay 80% of public sector salaries. Turkey is holding out in a bid to pressure Baghdad to drop a separate arbitration case.    

Read more

Turkey’s Spymaster-Turned-Foreign Minister Could Reshape Iraq Policy

Mehmet Alaca, The Arab Gulf States Institute Since winning Turkey’s critical May 28 runoff election, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has made a number of surprising Cabinet appointments. Notably, Hakan Fidan, who led the National Intelligence Organization for 13 years, was appointed minister of foreign affairs. Fidan was replaced as spymaster by Ibrahim Kalin, a former presidential spokesperson who also previously served as Erdogan’s foreign policy and security advisor and has worked closely with Fidan in the past. Cooperation between the two may increase the operational convergence between the National Intelligence Organization and the Foreign Ministry. Fidan was one of the architects of Turkey’s turn to geopolitical activism, which integrated the intelligence, security, and foreign policy ecosystems and drove Turkish involvement in Libya, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Nagorno-Karabakh in the past decade. As an experienced foreign policy actor whose main academic focus in his doctoral studies was the role of intelligence in foreign policy, Fidan may be able to strengthen the intelligence pillar of Turkish diplomacy. In light of Turkey’s recent increase in military operations against the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or PKK, in Iraq as well as Fidan’s contacts with Kurdish political actors and his key role in handling the Iraq file, his appointment could lead to a paradigm shift in Turkey’s Iraq policy. The PKK Remains a Flashpoint Turkey’s ties with Iraq have fluctuated since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. Initially, Ankara pursued a policy capitalizing on the rivalry between Baghdad and Erbil. However, since the failed September 2017 independence referendum for the Kurdistan region, Turkey has worked with both Baghdad and Erbil in a complementary fashion rather than playing them against each other. Ankara and Baghdad have a crucial strategic relationship, but unresolved issues have nonetheless kept them at odds. The most challenging issues, Turkey’s anti-PKK military operations and dozens of military outposts in Iraq, long resented in Baghdad, are crucial components of its Iraq policy. For over 40 years, Turkey has fought the PKK, which has been based in Iraq’s northern Qandil Mountains since the late 1990s. It has been designated a terrorist group by Turkey, the United States, and the European Union. Since 2016, as its human and technological intelligence capacity has grown, the National Intelligence Organization has expanded its military activities against the PKK in northern Iraq, especially in Sinjar, Sulaymaniyah, and Makhmur. In April, a suspected Turkish drone strike near Sulaymaniyah’s airport targeted a convoy that included three U.S. military personnel and Mazloum Abdi, commander of the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces, a significant portion of which is made up of members of the PKK’s Syrian offshoot. (The United States, which cooperates with the SDF in Syria in the fight against the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant, does not consider the SDF a terrorist organization.) Many Iraqi officials have denounced Turkey’s military operations as egregious violations of sovereignty and for their irredentist aspects. Baghdad has repeatedly requested that Ankara withdraw from its Bashiqa military base near Mosul, and Iranian-backed armed groups have attacked Turkish military outposts in northern Iraq. Ankara, which favors the status quo between Erbil and Baghdad and opposes Kurdish independence, supports the balance between the region’s two main Kurdish political parties – the Erbil-based Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Sulaymaniyah-based Patriotic Union of Kurdistan. Turkey has strong relations with the KDP due to their close political and commercial ties and similar perspective regarding countering the PKK’s activities in northern Iraq. On the other hand, Turkey has recently had serious tensions with the PUK due to its alleged affiliations with the PKK. Although Fidan, who is Kurdish and reportedly has close contacts with Kurdish political actors in Iraq, is expected to maintain close ties with the KDP, Turkey’s pressure on the PUK is also likely to continue. Shortly after the attack at the Sulaymaniyah airport, Fidan reportedly hosted Qubad Talabani, the deputy prime minister of the Kurdistan Regional Government and a PUK member, in Ankara, where, according to media accounts, Fidan expressed Turkey’s displeasure with “the PUK’s relations with the SDF and the PKK.” If the PUK takes steps to distance itself from the SDF and PKK, it may be easier for Ankara to publicly engage in diplomacy with the PUK. Ankara is demanding the PUK (as well as Baghdad) address the PKK issue with the same determination the KDP has demonstrated. As foreign minister, Fidan will likely wear both his intelligence and diplomatic hats, integrating security policy into Turkey’s diplomatic initiatives, as he works to continue to apply pressure on the PKK. Sunnis Will Not Be Neglected Turkey values its relations with Iraq’s Sunni population stemming from historical and ideological ties and proximity. This led Turkey to work to reintegrate Sunnis into Iraqi politics after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, despite Ankara’s limited influence in Iraq in the early years after the 2003 invasion, particularly with Shia actors, representing the dominant source of political power. In current Iraqi political dynamics, Turkey’s relations with the Shia-led government of Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed al-Sudani are healthy. Turkey focused on bringing together Iraq’s disorganized Sunni political actors after the 2021 Iraqi parliamentary elections, which were followed by a prolonged struggle to form a government. Fidan organized numerous meetings between Erdogan and rival Sunni politicians Mohammed Halbousi and Khamis al-Khanjar in 2021 and 2022. The presence of Fidan in a photograph with the Iraqi Sunni leaders shared after a February 2022 meeting, signaled this close consultation even while provoking short-lived but strong reactions in Baghdad. Ankara is aware that an Iraqi government consisting of pro-Iranian parties could force Sunnis to align more closely with Tehran, a realistic possibility considering Halbousi’s and Khanjar’s pragmatism and close relations with pro-Iranian groups. For this reason, it is almost certain that Fidan will continue his backdoor diplomacy to integrate Sunnis into Iraqi politics. Although Ankara rejects the perception that it supports Iraq’s Sunni politicians, that has been the case in practice, and Ankara is likely to continue these efforts and encourage continued contact between the predominately Sunni Kurds and Sunni Arabs. The Turkmen File Needs Revision Turkey has also long pursued a policy to protect the rights of Iraqi Turkmen, centered on support for the Iraqi Turkmen Front, a Turkmen political coalition. However, it is unlikely that this strategy has reached the entire Turkmen population, which Turkey claims to be 2 million. About half of Iraq’s Turkmen are Shias, while the other half are Sunnis. Since March 2021, the former leader of the Iraqi Turkmen Front, Arshad Salihi, and his successor, Hasan Turan, have been locked in a leadership struggle that underscores the fragility of Turkmen politics and society and makes sustained, broad-based Turkish influence in this key ethnic group challenging. With the fight against ISIL, the Shia-Sunni split among the Turkmen became more visible. While Shia Turkmen have become closer to pro-Iranian groups, there is a perception that Turkey prioritizes Sunni Turkmen. Fidan’s October 2022 appearance with the Iraqi Turkmen Front in Erbil was read as a clear show of support for Turan, who some believe is allied with the Muslim Brotherhood, a perception negatively affecting Turkey’s relations with Shia Turkmen. It is unclear whether Ankara’s Turkmen policy will change with Fidan leading the Foreign Ministry. However, if Turkey does not change the perception that its involvement in Turkmen politics is centered on the Iraqi Turkmen Front and Sunnis, the crisis in Turkmen politics will worsen.  Economic Ties Are the Top Priority The long-standing stated priorities of Turkey’s Iraq policy have been security, Iraq’s territorial integrity, and economic relations. Regarding the latter, with a trade volume of over $20 billion in 2022, Iraq and Turkey are major trade partners, and Turkey-Iraq commerce has grown in recent years. As a result, Turkey seeks to separate economic ties from tense political and security issues in its relations with Iraq. Going forward, completing the massive “Development Road” (also known as the “Dry Canal”) project – a highway and rail line from the southern Iraqi city of Basra to Turkey – will be an extremely important area of Turkish-Iraqi cooperation. The project is envisioned as a transportation hub between Asia and Europe, with Erdogan claiming that the $17 billion project has the potential to be the “new Silk Road of our region.” Meanwhile, Turkey is seeking negotiations related to damages the International Chamber of Commerce’s Court of Arbitration in Paris ordered Turkey to pay Iraq in a ruling on a long-running dispute with Iraq regarding crude oil exports from Iraqi Kurdistan. Ankara halted Iraq’s 450,000 barrels per day of northern exports through the Iraq-Turkey pipeline on March 25. After taking office as foreign minister, Fidan said he aims to “further develop” Turkey’s “national foreign policy vision.” Major changes to the basic dynamics of Turkey-Iraq relations during Fidan’s tenure are unlikely, but he may bring about a paradigm shift in terms of approach by institutionalizing a security-oriented foreign policy within the diplomatic framework. However, given Turkey’s escalating economic crisis, Ankara will likely prioritize its economy above all else and ensure any changes in its policy don’t undermine economic relations with Iraq.

Read more

US: Congress wants to give air defence systems to Kurdish fighters in Iraq

By Sean Mathews US lawmakers are looking to get air defence systems into the hands of Kurdish Peshmerga fighters in northern Iraq after the region was struck by a series of missile and drone attacks by Iran and Turkey.  On Wednesday, the House passed an amendment by Republican Congressman Don Bacon that would support the transfer of air defence systems to the Iraqi Kurdish peshmerga. The vote came during a markup of the fiscal 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), an annual piece of legislation that sets the budget for the Pentagon. Bacon told Middle East Eye the measure had "strong bipartisan support", adding that it “would direct the US administration to prepare and implement a plan of action to train and equip Kurdish Peshmerga and Iraqi security forces to defend against attacks by Iranian missiles, rockets and unmanned systems”. The Peshmerga are fighters in Iraqi Kurdistan. They work with the Iraqi security forces and receive arms and financial assistance from the US as part of Washington’s campaign to defeat the Islamic State militant (IS) group. Iraqi Kurdistan is relatively stable but last year the region witnessed an escalation of violence as both Iran and Turkey launched air strikes against Kurdish groups operating in the area. The Kurdish regional government of Iraq (KRG) allows Iranian Kurdish groups to operate in the region but also maintains ties with Tehran. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps targeted Kurdish-Iranian armed opposition groups in late 2022, when Tehran was struggling to control mass protests sparked by the death of a young Kurdish woman in police custody. The US condemned the missile and drone attacks at the time, which Washington said "brazenly violated Iraq’s sovereignty".  The Kurdish Peshmerga already receive about $20m a month in the form of stipends from the US Department of Defence, Jonathan Lord, head of the Middle East security programme at the Center for a New American Security, told MEE. He cautioned that providing air defence systems for the Peshmerga could run up against supply constraints, as US allies jockey for the armaments. “US air defence systems are in very high demand,” he told MEE. “Ukraine, Gulf states, the KRG - every country or region where Iranian loitering munitions, ballistic missiles, or rockets pose a threat, is a place looking to strengthen its air defence capabilities,” he said. The war in Ukraine has occupied Washington’s attention, but the Middle East still features prominently in the draft NDAA being hammered out by the House and Senate. Israel precision-guided munitions A separate amendment in the House draft NDAA calls for the extension of financial assistance to vetted Syrian groups and partner forces in Iraq to counter IS. The US combat mission in Iraq ended in December 2021, but roughly 2,500 troops are in the country - mainly in the north and Baghdad - serving in an advise and assist capacity via an agreement with the government of Iraq. Around 900 US troops are stationed in northeast Syria working alongside Kurdish forces. The official justification for the US presence is the 2001 and 2002 Authorizations for Use of Military Force, which Congress passed after the 11 September attacks to combat the militant group al-Qaeda. The US presence in Syria has become a back-burner issue, but with few American casualties and Washington’s foes and Iran and Russia entrenched in the country, efforts to end the US footprint have not gained traction in Congress. Lawmakers are also concerned that Turkey could take advantage of an American withdrawal to launch an assault on Kurdish militants it considers “terrorists” but who the US regards as allies.  As expected, US-Israeli military ties also take up a big chunk of the 2024 NDAA’s Middle East portfolio. One of the main concerns among lawmakers appears to be how the war in Ukraine might impact Washington’s ability to arm its closest Middle East ally. In January, The New York Times reported that the Pentagon had tapped into its military stockpile in Israel - known as WRSA-I - to provide artillery shells to Kyiv. An amendment in the House NDAA calls on the Pentagon to provide a report on the status of US stockpiles of precision-guided munitions in Israel. Lawmakers want to know the “quantity and type of munitions” the US transferred to Ukraine and what the Pentagon will replace them with in order to maintain Israel’s qualitative military edge against its neighbours. The amendment also calls for the secretary of defence to brief lawmakers on the potential for increased US-Israel defence collaboration in emerging technologies. Lawmakers are also working to include legislation designed to counter maritime threats emanating from Iran in the NDAA, Congressional sources told MEE. The Maritime Act was introduced in April by the Abraham Accords Caucuses in the Senate and House, with the aim of strengthening security cooperation between Israel, the US and its Arab partners. Israel and Arab countries have quietly cooperated on security and intelligence matters for decades, but ties came out in the open with the signing of the Abraham Accords when the UAE, Morocco and Bahrain normalised relations with Israel. Despite a flourishing arms trade and closer engagement between these countries in formats like Centcom - US military command for the Middle East - Arab countries have recently signalled a more cautious approach to Israel amid concerns about getting caught in a potential clash between Israel and Iran. The UAE and Saudi Arabia have both restored diplomatic relations with Tehran. Meanwhile, plans for a summit between Arab countries, Israel and the US in Morocco were shelved by Rabat amid rising tensions in the occupied West Bank.  

Read more

Turkey's Erdogan: releasing Demirtas from jail out of question

Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan said in his victory speech on Sunday that releasing former pro-Kurdish party leader Selahattin Demirtas, who he called a "terrorist," would not be possible under his governance. Erdogan extended his two decades in power in elections on Sunday, winning a mandate to pursue increasingly authoritarian policies which have polarised Turkey and strengthened its position as a regional military power. aDemirtas has been jailed pending trial over terrorism charges, which he denies, since 2016. (Reuters) 

Read more

London Elects a Kurd as New Mayor

Kurdish politician Sarbaz Barznji has been elected as the new Mayor of Lambeth, promising to do his best to serve the community, according to an official statement. “I promise to do everything in my power to serve this community well. Together, we can create a brighter, more inclusive future for ourselves, our children, and future generations.” Barznji, in a Twitter statement, expressed his "deep honor" and "privilege" to serve the "vibrant community" of Lambeth and contribute to a "brighter future" for everyone. “I am deeply honored to have been elected as your Mayor. It is my privilege to serve this vibrant community and contribute to a brighter future for everyone.”  he wrote in a tweet.  

Read more

Turkey Says Iraq Was Ordered to Pay Compensation to Ankara in Arbitration Case

The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) ordered Iraq to pay compensation to Turkey for several violations concerning a longstanding international arbitration case regarding crude oil exports from Iraq's Kurdish Regional Government (KRG), Türkiye’s Energy Ministry said Tuesday in a statement. The statement came after reports claimed that Iraq halted crude exports Saturday from the KRG's northern Kirkuk fields after Iraq won an arbitration case against Turkey. "At this stage of the (arbitration) case, members of the Arbitral Tribunal have rejected four of the five claims Iraq has put forward," the ministry said, adding that the majority of Türkiye's demands were accepted. "They ordered Iraq to pay compensation to Turkey for these violations," it said. The ministry said the issue was "a reflection of a years-long dispute" between the Iraqi central government and KRG about sharing oil revenues. " Turkey has always respected the unity and territorial integrity of Iraq and has been working relentlessly for the political and economic stability of both Iraq and the KRG government," it said. Despite instability in the region, the ministry said Turkey has undertaken billions of dollars in expenditures to keep the Iraq- Turkey Oil Pipeline System operational since 1973, which also helped maintain stability in global oil markets. "It has conducted intensive diplomacy with both parties and relevant countries to arrive at an amicable settlement of the dispute," it said. The ministry expressed readiness to fulfill the requirements of international law and to make any contribution to the permanent settlement of the conflict between Iraq’s central government and the KRG. With its proven oil reserves of approximately 145 billion barrels, Iraq is the fifth-largest producer in the world and the second-biggest OPEC producer with a daily production of more than 4.5 million barrels. The country has been in a deadlock for years due to the misuse of resources and the unfair distribution of oil revenues.  

Read more

Top US general Mark Milley makes surprise visit to Syria

Draw Media, Al-Monitor Gen. Mark Milley's visit to US troops fighting the Islamic State came as Pentagon officials warn Russia's arms transfers to Iran will embolden the IRGC and its proxies in the Middle East. Top US general Mark Milley made a surprise visit on Saturday to Syria, where fewer than 1,000 American troops continue to support local militia forces combatting the remnants of the Islamic State (IS) group. Milley, who serves as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and is ending his term in September, met with the commander of the US-led coalition to defeat IS, Army Maj. Gen. Matthew McFarlane, and reviewed security measures from an undisclosed base in Syria’s northeast. Why it matters: The arrival of Washington’s top general to Syria signals the Biden administration’s seriousness about keeping troops in the country in support of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).   Nearly four years after the IS defeat on the battlefield, some 10,000 suspected fighters from the group remain in makeshift prisons under SDF control, with not even a hint of international political will to establish war crimes tribunals on the horizon. Lingering IS networks have staged at least two major attempts to break their ideological kin out of the facilities over the past year. Early last year, a coordinated IS assault on the Ghweran prison in Hasakah left some 300 fighters dead before the SDF and US regained full control of the area. “We're committed to maintaining our force presence in support of the enduring defeat of ISIS,”  the Pentagon’s top Middle East policy official, Dana Stroul, told reporters last week. “This is a mission that has the full support of the Secretary of Defense,” Stroul said. Down but not out: US and SDF forces continue to track down IS financiers and operatives in northeast Syria, conducting 15 operations together in the month of February alone. Four US troops and a working dog were wounded on Feb. 16 when a suspected senior Islamic State official triggered an explosion during a nighttime raid on his safe-house. “There are still aspirations for radical fighters out there to continue to spread ISIS,” coalition commander McFarlane told reporters last week. The Biden administration is committed to “strategic patience,” Stroul said, as the military continues to build SDF and Iraqi security forces’ abilities to eventually contain IS on their own. Iraq’s Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani has said he supports the continued presence of US military advisers in his country to help prevent IS’ return. But absent any political resolution to Syria’s decade-long civil war, there’s no sign of an endgame for the US military's role alongside the lightly-armed SDF, whose autonomy is not recognized by the Bashar al-Assad regime in Damascus, and is considered by neighboring Turkey to be a terrorist organization. Regional context: The top general’s visit suggests Pentagon officials remain keenly attuned to the threats posed to US troops in Syria by another adversary: Iran. Biden administration officials have grown increasingly concerned that the introduction of Russian technical support for Iran’s already sophisticated arsenal of drones and guided missiles in return for Tehran’s backing for the war in Ukraine will only embolden the IRGC and its proxies in the Middle East. Militias backed by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps have a heavy presence west of the Euphrates River in Syria’s east, and launched dozens if not hundreds of rockets and armed drones at US positions in both Iraq and Syria over the past few years. US troops in the region are not typically authorized to strike at forces other than IS and Al-Qaeda unless acting in self-defense. Russian pilots have also ramped up their harassment to keep pressure on American forces in Syria over the past year-plus, conducting unauthorized flyovers of US bases on a "daily basis," according to the top US Air Force commander in the Middle East. "Frankly it’s a bit distracting," Lt. Gen. Alex Grynkewich told reporters last month. Pushback: Milley’s visit comes just over a week after US Congressman Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) introduced a war powers bill that would force the Biden administration to withdraw US troops from Syria. The bill is unlikely to clear the House, but a previous measure issued in 2021 gained some bipartisan support.  

Read more

Why Turkey is changing tactics in Syria and Iraq

Operation Claw-Sword, a coordinated campaign against Kurdish armed groups, marks a new phase in Ankara's strategy Draw Media, Middle East Eye. The Turkish military launched air strikes last month against Kurdish armed groups in northern Syria and northern Iraq, marking a new phase in Turkey’s strategy beyond its own borders. While the campaign has been described as retaliation for the 13 November bombing on Istanbul’s Istiklal Avenue, which killed six people and wounded dozens more, the latest military operation is more than just reactive. Indeed, the timing, scope, objectives and methodology of Operation Claw-Sword all point to a paradigm shift in Turkey’s strategy to counter the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and their Syrian affiliate, the YPG. According to Turkey’s defence ministry, the strikes destroyed 89 targets in Syria and Iraq, including shelters and ammunition depots. The onslaught came just days after Ankara accused the PKK of carrying out the Istanbul bombing, charges the group has denied. The military operation reportedly involved dozens of conventional aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), supported by intensive artillery shelling. In Iraq, the barrage targeted Qandil, Asos and Hakurk; and in Syria, it hit Kobane, Tal Rifaat, Cizire, and Derik, Turkey’s defense ministry said. Conventional aircraft did not enter Syrian airspace, with the Turkish military instead relying on air-to-ground munitions operated with accurate guidance kits. The UAVs played an important role in constant surveillance and instant engagement against sensitive targets where the Turkish Air Force did not risk deploying F-16s. Conversely, in Iraq, the air force flew its F-16s - but the difference between Turkey’s routine strikes in northern Iraq and the latest campaign was both its intensity and its simultaneity with the offensive in Syria. Indeed, Operation Claw-Sword reveals a new paradigm in Turkey’s strategy against the PKK and YPG, which can be observed at a strategic, operational and tactical level. At the strategic level, it involves simultaneous engagement in northern Iraq and northern Syria, using both air and artillery strikes, pointing to Ankara’s coordination against the perceived Kurdish threat in both countries. At the operational level, the new paradigm involves the resumption of Turkey’s drive to remove the YPG from northern Syria - a process that relies on the optimisation of developments within the domestic, regional and international spheres. In this regard, Turkey has almost achieved its objectives with Operation Claw-Lock, launched this past April to target PKK positions in northern Iraq. Now, Turkey seemingly aims to expand the “Claw” concept into Syria, in an effort to further destabilise Kurdish armed groups. ­­­ Finally, at the tactical level, the new paradigm involves the combination of weaponry to hit both targets in close proximity to the Turkish border, as well as sensitive strategic targets deeper into Syria and Iraq. The Turkish military is increasing its methods of engagement against Kurdish armed groups without a fully fledged ground offensive. This increasingly aggressive engagement structure will likely dominate and shape the conflict environment in northern Syria and northern Iraq until a new, comprehensive, cross-border deterritorialisation operation is launched in northern Syria. Operation Claw-Sword has not ended, and it can be expected to continue - with changing intensity - in both Iraq and Syria, until the best opportunity presents itself to start a new cross-border military offensive. On its own, the Istanbul bombing did not provide a sufficient reason to launch such an operation, which would likely have begun anyway upon the conclusion of Operation Claw-Lock. The attack, however, might have pushed Turkey to unveil its new combat strategy earlier than planned - and the current campaign is shaping the conflict environment for future ground operations.

Read more

Iran’s oil ministry opens offices in Baghdad, Basra, Kurdistan

Al-Monitor Iran is opening offices for its oil ministries in several Iraqi cities to expand cooperation in oil, gas and other energy sectors. The Iranian oil ministry has opened an office in Baghdad to expand the energy cooperation between the two countries. “The Baghdad office will manage all other offices that the ministry is planning to open in the near future,” said Sayyed Abbas Beheshti, head of the ministry's Iraq desk, which also plans to open offices in Basra and Kurdistan. This comes in conjunction with Iraqi prime minister Muhammad Shia Sudani visit to Tehran. Per his arrival to Baghdad today, Sudani twitted "We finished our visit to the Islamic Republic of Iran. We had serious discussions with the leadership there, led by His Eminence Mr. @ar_khamenei. We look forward to more bilateral cooperation in order to move forward in the files of security, economy, culture and religious tourism." The current Iranian government of president Ebrahim Raisi priorities regional cooperation. Many Iranian ministries have opened a special desk for Iraq and some other neighboring countries. The majority of Iraq and Iran's trade is in the energy sector. Iraq imports up to 40 million cubic meters of gas from Iran, which provides about 50 percent of Iraq's electricity production. Iranian gas is transferred to Iraq through two pipelines, in the south in Basra-Shalamcheh border and in the middle in Naft Khaneh. The two pipelines can transfer up to 70 million cubic meters to Iraq, but Iran is not able to provide this amount because of Western sanctions. A source in Iraq's oil ministry told Al-Monitor that the two countries have been working recently on a gas swap with Turkmenistan, under which Turkmen gas would be used in northern Iran and Iran in turn would provide the same additional amount of gas to Iraq.   Iran also exports electricity to Iraq, and the Iranian-based MAPNA company contributes electricity in Iraq through a generator in Ramileh in southern Basra. Iran and Iraq also have several shared oil fields, mostly in the southern region, which requires cooperation between the two countries. Iraq enjoys an upper hand in using these fields due to the sanctions on Iran. Iran's oil ministry is also interested in building refineries and generators with Iraq, but little has been achieved so far. The new offices will work on this process as well, according to a source in Iran’s oil ministry who spoke on condition of anonymity. Iran also helps to sell its oil through Iraq as a method of circumventing the sanctions. This has happened several times in the past and it might resume and even expand, especially under Iraqi new government which is formed by mostly Iran-backed groups and militias. In a meeting with Iraqi prime minister Muhammad Shia Sudani yesterday, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei praised the new government in Iraq, urging Sudani to stand up to common enemies.  

Read more

All Contents are reserved by Draw media.
Developed by Smarthand